If you are sitting in a vehicle, stopped, on the roadside or on private property, and a cop pulls up and blocks your vehicle from moving, other than the HTA obligations under sec 33 to identify the driver, and provide ownership and insurance info, what obligations are there?....do I have to answer questions as to what I am am doing or why or whatever?? Do they have to provide ID ie badge number on request....I could not see one on them, or a vehicle ID number???
If you are sitting in a vehicle, stopped, on the roadside or on private property, and a cop pulls up and blocks your vehicle from moving, other than the HTA obligations under sec 33 to identify the driver, and provide ownership and insurance info, what obligations are there?....do I have to answer questions as to what I am am doing or why or whatever??
Do they have to provide ID ie badge number on request....I could not see one on them, or a vehicle ID number???
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want. Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that. Then you might get that unwated attention....
WilliamWorthington3 wrote:
If you have nothing to hide, why be confrontational and non cooperative.
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want.
Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that.
About a year ago I was on a side street doing crossword puzzles. I looked in my rear-view and saw the cherry lights, what a surprise. I was just sitting there not even noticing that I was pulled over. I was in no hurry and the cop was on his way quickly . They can ask to look but if they just search whatever they find is useless in court unless it is something criminal "seen from out-side car "(booze/drugs/guns). In my case he said he was checking to see if I was ok. weird as he took another 3 minutes to approach my car.(after I noticed him). Cheers Viper1
About a year ago I was on a side street doing crossword puzzles.
I looked in my rear-view and saw the cherry lights, what a surprise.
I was just sitting there not even noticing that I was pulled over.
I was in no hurry and the cop was on his way quickly .
They can ask to look but if they just search whatever they find is useless in court unless
it is something criminal "seen from out-side car "(booze/drugs/guns).
In my case he said he was checking to see if I was ok.
weird as he took another 3 minutes to approach my car.(after I noticed him).
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
Well depends on the private property. Many business have given the police agent status. So did many apartment complexes. So if you cannot provide a legitimate reason for being there you can be trespassed which is arrestable. If you do not want to say anything best is to remain silent as that is your right. Getting confrontational could get you arrested and it would be a legal arrest. While you might not agree as long as they have status it will stand up Ops
Well depends on the private property. Many business have given the police agent status. So did many apartment complexes. So if you cannot provide a legitimate reason for being there you can be trespassed which is arrestable.
If you do not want to say anything best is to remain silent as that is your right. Getting confrontational could get you arrested and it would be a legal arrest. While you might not agree as long as they have status it will stand up
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want. Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that. Nobody said it was a police state. And the police can ask you anything in the world that they want- but that doesn't mean you have any lawful obligation to answer them. Questions that seem frivolous and unnecessary to you might be relevant to another on-going investigation that could involve a similar vehicle or similar description of yourself. Answering simple questions is very often more than enough to remove any suspicion the officer might have in his mind- and as a tax payer I'm sure you'd rather have the police focus on the actual persons of interest and have you moved right along. By being uncooperative you're only serving to complicate the investigation needlessly. Perhaps totally irrelevant to the actual OP's topic at hand, consider this situation I was recently involved in (as a uniform police officer)... I was on bicycle and conducted an HTA stop on a person that I noticed did not have proper bicycle equipment (light, bell, etc). This person was a visible minority. I ALSO recognized this same person as a person of interest in a recent homicide. Of course, I'm not going to divulge that information to the subject right off hand because the investigation is on-going and further information is obviously required. So I conducted the HTA stop and asked a series of questions that may or may not have had anything necessarily to do with the initial HTA stop. The interaction between myself and this person was going well- useful information, he was polite, and so on. Another (white) cyclist, observing the entire scenerio, began jumping up and down, waving, pointing and screaming at me because I stopped the black male as opposed to the whites. He was yelling at the top of his lungs about racism and so on and so forth... a crowd forms, cell phones come out... and here I come attempting to collect information regarding a recent homicide while some lunatic is jibber jabbing on and on about how it's a police state and how I'm racist, etc etc and encouraging the crowd to do the same. How much useful information do you think I got from the person of interest in the homicide after the circus started? Gee... thanks for the help, citizens. So, often when I read people's automatic, off-the-cuff 'don't answer their questions or be friendly, it's not a police state', it reminds me of situations like the one I described.... trust me, dude, the cops aren't out there to 'get ya'. Nor are they out there to harass you needlessly. We aren't asking these questions to see if you're into the same hobbies that I am and well, hey, why don't ya come over for dinner... We are trying to get a job done and, yes, granted it infrequently gets in the way of common citizens.
WilliamWorthington3 wrote:
If you have nothing to hide, why be confrontational and non cooperative.
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want.
Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that.
Nobody said it was a police state.
And the police can ask you anything in the world that they want- but that doesn't mean you have any lawful obligation to answer them. Questions that seem frivolous and unnecessary to you might be relevant to another on-going investigation that could involve a similar vehicle or similar description of yourself. Answering simple questions is very often more than enough to remove any suspicion the officer might have in his mind- and as a tax payer I'm sure you'd rather have the police focus on the actual persons of interest and have you moved right along. By being uncooperative you're only serving to complicate the investigation needlessly.
Perhaps totally irrelevant to the actual OP's topic at hand, consider this situation I was recently involved in (as a uniform police officer)...
I was on bicycle and conducted an HTA stop on a person that I noticed did not have proper bicycle equipment (light, bell, etc). This person was a visible minority. I ALSO recognized this same person as a person of interest in a recent homicide. Of course, I'm not going to divulge that information to the subject right off hand because the investigation is on-going and further information is obviously required. So I conducted the HTA stop and asked a series of questions that may or may not have had anything necessarily to do with the initial HTA stop.
The interaction between myself and this person was going well- useful information, he was polite, and so on.
Another (white) cyclist, observing the entire scenerio, began jumping up and down, waving, pointing and screaming at me because I stopped the black male as opposed to the whites. He was yelling at the top of his lungs about racism and so on and so forth... a crowd forms, cell phones come out... and here I come attempting to collect information regarding a recent homicide while some lunatic is jibber jabbing on and on about how it's a police state and how I'm racist, etc etc and encouraging the crowd to do the same.
How much useful information do you think I got from the person of interest in the homicide after the circus started? Gee... thanks for the help, citizens.
So, often when I read people's automatic, off-the-cuff 'don't answer their questions or be friendly, it's not a police state', it reminds me of situations like the one I described.... trust me, dude, the cops aren't out there to 'get ya'. Nor are they out there to harass you needlessly. We aren't asking these questions to see if you're into the same hobbies that I am and well, hey, why don't ya come over for dinner... We are trying to get a job done and, yes, granted it infrequently gets in the way of common citizens.
No, I am not the chief of Toronto Police.
No, I do not work for Toronto Police...
... it is just a name folks
This reminds me of two summers ago when my friend and I got pulled over late down town in Ottawa. My friend works as a server at a 24/7 restaurant and I was picking him up at about 12 A.M. I was not too familiar with down town so I turned into a dead end street, as I turned out I noticed there were 2 cops behind me at the red light. The light turns green and there you have it, the lights come on. They pull me over telling me that my license sticker was expired (it was the 3rd of July and I forgot to renew it). He then asks why I went into the dead end street obviously accusing me of making some drug sale, I explain to him that I thought it was a way out and only realized it was a dead end once I was in there. They go back to their cars and I expect to get my ticket and move on but nope, we have a cop with Napoleon syndrome on our hands. He then tells me and my friend to step out of the car, we do so and one cop starts searching my friend and his work bag while the other places me on his car, cuffs me and then performs a search after asking if I have any sharp weapons. It was embarrassing as hell, people are walking by and I am getting treated like a criminal because of my expired license sticker and a wrong turn. After completely searching me he then tells me he is going to search the car and if I admit to having drugs in it he will take them and nothing else will happen (B.S lies of cops) he also said that if I didn't agree to the search they would bring in the dogs. I was in shock and asked him if this is how he treats people with expired license stickers and he snapped at me threatening to bring me into jail and detain me for 48 hours. I let them search my car and of course they found nothing, my God did they go through it thoroughly, like kids opening their gifts on Christmas day expecting to find that new Xbox. They found nothing and the prick then gives me all the tickets after humiliating me and my friend. So to the guy who said "if you have nothing to hide then who cares" how would you have liked to have been in my situation? It was embarrassing and demeaning as hell. Cops are not God, this is not Soviet Russia and people have rights.
This reminds me of two summers ago when my friend and I got pulled over late down town in Ottawa. My friend works as a server at a 24/7 restaurant and I was picking him up at about 12 A.M. I was not too familiar with down town so I turned into a dead end street, as I turned out I noticed there were 2 cops behind me at the red light. The light turns green and there you have it, the lights come on. They pull me over telling me that my license sticker was expired (it was the 3rd of July and I forgot to renew it). He then asks why I went into the dead end street obviously accusing me of making some drug sale, I explain to him that I thought it was a way out and only realized it was a dead end once I was in there. They go back to their cars and I expect to get my ticket and move on but nope, we have a cop with Napoleon syndrome on our hands. He then tells me and my friend to step out of the car, we do so and one cop starts searching my friend and his work bag while the other places me on his car, cuffs me and then performs a search after asking if I have any sharp weapons. It was embarrassing as hell, people are walking by and I am getting treated like a criminal because of my expired license sticker and a wrong turn. After completely searching me he then tells me he is going to search the car and if I admit to having drugs in it he will take them and nothing else will happen (B.S lies of cops) he also said that if I didn't agree to the search they would bring in the dogs. I was in shock and asked him if this is how he treats people with expired license stickers and he snapped at me threatening to bring me into jail and detain me for 48 hours. I let them search my car and of course they found nothing, my God did they go through it thoroughly, like kids opening their gifts on Christmas day expecting to find that new Xbox. They found nothing and the prick then gives me all the tickets after humiliating me and my friend.
So to the guy who said "if you have nothing to hide then who cares" how would you have liked to have been in my situation? It was embarrassing and demeaning as hell. Cops are not God, this is not Soviet Russia and people have rights.
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush!
12345 wrote:
So to the guy who said "if you have nothing to hide then who cares" how would you have liked to have been in my situation? It was embarrassing and demeaning as hell. Cops are not God, this is not Soviet Russia and people have rights.
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush!
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush! I Know you are a youngster HWBEAR 40 years ago I got in my car and headed for east coast. This is true! I got 2 3 rivers and pulled my station wagon over and went to sleep. agh forget it to much typeing Cheers Viper1
hwybear wrote:
12345 wrote:
So to the guy who said "if you have nothing to hide then who cares" how would you have liked to have been in my situation? It was embarrassing and demeaning as hell. Cops are not God, this is not Soviet Russia and people have rights.
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush!
I Know you are a youngster HWBEAR
40 years ago I got in my car and headed for east coast.
This is true!
I got 2 3 rivers and pulled my station wagon over and went to sleep.
agh forget it to much typeing
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
I was stopped, probably 20 years ago, on highway 20 in Montreal by the SQ. I admit, I was doing about 120km in 100km so I though it was going to be a speeding ticket. Much to my surprise, two officers exit the PC with sidearms drawn, take up strategic positions and order me out. I was definitely under a tremendous amount of stress by the possibilities unfolding before me but after answering some straightforward questions, the officers stood down and advised me to stop speeding and left quickly. An obvious identity check (my car possibly fit the description in an investigation) and I felt the officers were just doing their job, protecting both me and themselves. No harm, no foul. So I don't understand why people are jumpy when the police are doing their job. Let them do what they need to, in the safest way possible for everyone, and get back to your life afterward. You only need to worry if you've done something wrong and in that case, you probably deserve what's coming to you.
I was stopped, probably 20 years ago, on highway 20 in Montreal by the SQ. I admit, I was doing about 120km in 100km so I though it was going to be a speeding ticket. Much to my surprise, two officers exit the PC with sidearms drawn, take up strategic positions and order me out. I was definitely under a tremendous amount of stress by the possibilities unfolding before me but after answering some straightforward questions, the officers stood down and advised me to stop speeding and left quickly. An obvious identity check (my car possibly fit the description in an investigation) and I felt the officers were just doing their job, protecting both me and themselves. No harm, no foul.
So I don't understand why people are jumpy when the police are doing their job. Let them do what they need to, in the safest way possible for everyone, and get back to your life afterward. You only need to worry if you've done something wrong and in that case, you probably deserve what's coming to you.
Are you kidding??? There are any number of ways that a mistake on someone else' part could cost you dearly. No one is perfect; not even a cop. It worked out okay for you which is great. But not everyone had your luck. It might be better if procedures were put in place to minimize the possibility of mistakes.
G35Dalf wrote:
You only need to worry if you've done something wrong and in that case, you probably deserve what's coming to you.
Are you kidding??? There are any number of ways that a mistake on someone else' part could cost you dearly. No one is perfect; not even a cop. It worked out okay for you which is great. But not everyone had your luck.
It might be better if procedures were put in place to minimize the possibility of mistakes.
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush! I am not embellishing in any way or leaving out any points. The only other suspicion the cop could have had was that I drive an 06 GT Mustang and at the time was 19. My parents bought it for me as a birthday gift, every cop now thinks I am a drug dealer. I have been pulled over 12 times, only one of those times was for speeding, the rest were just suspicion pull overs. I never said this is how all cops behave, in fact funny enough the only cop that has been nice to me was the one who got me speeding 25 over. I was just saying that you can't just give cops power to do whatever they want because there are many bad apples in the police force who have and would abuse it. And I considered reporting it but it just wasn't worth the effort, a 19 year old coming in with the car I have and telling them that story? I can understand how it would be unbelievable to most, and all the two officers would have to say is that they did not search me and their side would be taken.
hwybear wrote:
12345 wrote:
So to the guy who said "if you have nothing to hide then who cares" how would you have liked to have been in my situation? It was embarrassing and demeaning as hell. Cops are not God, this is not Soviet Russia and people have rights.
and obviously we only heard your side of this...however, if this is completely true, you should have made a complaint, other than that, don't paint all enforcement officers with that same brush!
I am not embellishing in any way or leaving out any points. The only other suspicion the cop could have had was that I drive an 06 GT Mustang and at the time was 19. My parents bought it for me as a birthday gift, every cop now thinks I am a drug dealer. I have been pulled over 12 times, only one of those times was for speeding, the rest were just suspicion pull overs. I never said this is how all cops behave, in fact funny enough the only cop that has been nice to me was the one who got me speeding 25 over. I was just saying that you can't just give cops power to do whatever they want because there are many bad apples in the police force who have and would abuse it. And I considered reporting it but it just wasn't worth the effort, a 19 year old coming in with the car I have and telling them that story? I can understand how it would be unbelievable to most, and all the two officers would have to say is that they did not search me and their side would be taken.
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want. Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that. Then you might get that unwated attention.... Okay. So what is the polite way to say "I do not consent to give you permission to search me or my vehicle AND we both know you do not have probable cause to proceed?" Or, "I elect to exercise my right as a Canadian citizen to decline to answer questions beyond those proving my identity, qualification to drive, legal possession of the vehicle and insurance thereof?" No one wants to escalate an unpleasant situation, but clearly people are reporting that they feel compelled to consent to a search against their will. Worse yet, there may have been simply illegal searches. How do we stop that without attracting unwated[sic] attention? How do we politely say, "Officer, please get a wtharrant as is required by the law you are sworn to uphold?" Obviously, this does not apply to most cops. In all vocations we find well suited and less suited people.
paul1913 wrote:
WilliamWorthington3 wrote:
If you have nothing to hide, why be confrontational and non cooperative.
Because this isn't a police state where police can do / ask anything they want.
Some Officers occasionally need to be reminded of that.
Then you might get that unwated attention....
Okay. So what is the polite way to say "I do not consent to give you permission to search me or my vehicle AND we both know you do not have probable cause to proceed?" Or, "I elect to exercise my right as a Canadian citizen to decline to answer questions beyond those proving my identity, qualification to drive, legal possession of the vehicle and insurance thereof?"
No one wants to escalate an unpleasant situation, but clearly people are reporting that they feel compelled to consent to a search against their will. Worse yet, there may have been simply illegal searches. How do we stop that without attracting unwated[sic] attention? How do we politely say, "Officer, please get a wtharrant as is required by the law you are sworn to uphold?"
Obviously, this does not apply to most cops. In all vocations we find well suited and less suited people.
Okay. So what is the polite way to say "I do not consent to give you permission to search me or my vehicle."? The answer is. Do you have a search warrant? If not. say no you cannot. Cheers Viper1
Okay. So what is the polite way to say "I do not consent to give you permission to search me or my vehicle."?
The answer is. Do you have a search warrant?
If not. say no you cannot.
Cheers
Viper1
"hang onto your chair when reading my posts
use at your own risk"
If you are asked what you are doing here etc...if you got nothing to hide why worry? Cops are just looking out for the safety of the public. Ever think maybe just maybe they might be doing their job?
If you are asked what you are doing here etc...if you got nothing to hide why worry? Cops are just looking out for the safety of the public. Ever think maybe just maybe they might be doing their job?
The ways to search are: 1) an Act with search authorities (LLA, HTA, FWCA etc... 2) search warrant 3) consent to search (which is more than verbal asking, there is "consent to search forms that is signed by the driver")
viper1 wrote:
Okay. So what is the polite way to say "I do not consent to give you permission to search me or my vehicle."?
The answer is. Do you have a search warrant?
If not. say no you cannot.
Cheers
Viper1
The ways to search are:
1) an Act with search authorities (LLA, HTA, FWCA etc...
2) search warrant
3) consent to search (which is more than verbal asking, there is "consent to search forms that is signed by the driver")
Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
I will be going to trial for my red light camera offence.
I'll be arguing two issues, centered on the fact that there are two essential elements of 144(18) - a) a vehicle approaching the intersection shall stop; and b) the vehicle shall not proceed until green. Both essential elements must be contravened beyond a reasonable doubt to be an offence.
1) My ticket says I (being the owner) am "charged…
I know that the RIDE program has been covered extensively in these great forums, but I have a question about the stop itself:
I recently was stopped for a RIDE Program and the officer asked me to roll the window down all of the way (I had it at half and could easily communicate with them). I told them that I could hear them just fine and they insisted I roll it down all of the way. Again I told…
Not sure the right place for this so if it needs to be moved please do so.
I was stopped today for 15 over the speed limit, I gave all the documents to the officer and he said he could not accept a photocopy of my ownership only the original I had a photo copy front and back and I had my plate sticker number with it.
he gave me a ticket for HWY ACT Section 7(5)(a) he said only the original would…
Hey! I'm from Sudbury Ontario. Hope that general talk is fine for this subject
I am very serious about looking for exact ruling about underfacing lighting
Section 14 clearly states:
Red and blue lights to the front restricted
(14.1) In addition to the lighting requirements in this Part, a police department vehicle may carry lamps that cast red and blue lights, but no other motor vehicle shall carry…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I was pulled over and told I went through a red light during a right turn. I learned through a friend who is a police constable that the one who pulled me over is new to the job (under a year, and possibly even the first month or two of real duty).
I was given a ticket for $180. I have some questions:
(1) Is this offense automatically associated with 3 demerit points? I see no mention of them on…
I got a ticket for 'Disobey Stop Sign' in November of 2013 (in York Region), requested disclosure and went to court in August of 2014. At my first appearance, I did not plea but requested an ajournment to to consult legal advice. The JOP set the next appearance in September.
I contacted a paralegal about my options. He told me that on my next appearance, if the police officer did not show, the…
I had a trial and found guilty, but the trial seemed to go wrong since the beginning.
The JP asked me if i am intending to take the stand- I said NO.
I asked how to submit my evidence-documents and photos.
JP said-i have to take the stand if i want to submit evidence.(Now i am finding this is wrong-i could introduce my evidence during cross examination and my defense would be much stronger)
Ottawa, Canada (AHN) - Beginning Tuesday, or April Fool's Day 2008, fines on Quebec drivers caught overspeeding will be doubled. It is not only the money penalty that will go up, but also demerit points.
The new law, Bill 42, is similar to Ontario's street racing rule. It stipulates fines for motorists who drive at over 40 km/h at under 60 km/h zones, speed at 50 km/h at 60 to 90 km/h areas and…
Make big trucks go slower and the roads will become safer.
Obvious, isn't it? It's also obvious when you look out the window that the world is flat.
Last Monday, truckers in Ontario tried to mount a convoy to Queen's Park to show their opposition to electronic speed limiters. These devices, electronic chips in trucks' engine management systems, restrict speeds…
I was out on a four lane highway around Orangeville Ontario and I noticed a school bus coming south (I was going north). I kept my eyes on the bus in case it was going to stop. As I approached it, it was slowing down a little, but no lights, and especially no arm with the STOP sign. As I was just about to pass the bus, I still did not see the lights, nor did I see the STOP sign.
Hey everyone first off I'd like to say great website, I have been reading and it is very useful
I'm posting today as I'd like to get some feedback on my situation and have a couple of questions. Please excuse the vagueness in some areas - I don't want my case to be identifiable given the small town.
So I was driving up north and was pulled over by an OPP SUV for doing 31 over. Cop drove past me,…
Driving on a 80km/hr highway the car ahead hits the brakes and slows to 55, l slow down right behind him no reason to slow down traffic was moving between 80 and 90. I notice the driver is on the phone and looking through papers on the passenger seat. He begins to start to go a opp officer drives by doing 80 plus in oncoming lane turns around and says l was following to close. Told him what was…
My son was making a right turn at the intersection he had a green so slowed down looked and proceeded into the turn. It was pouring rain and the was a big pool of water as he got arround the curb. He tried to keep the car going sharp right however it slid into the car making a left turn. the lane he was turning into is very narrow and at a very busy corner. He paniced and left the scene only…
I had an collision the other day. I was turing left and ran into a car going straight in the opposite direction. The insurance company has already determined that I'm at fault, since I made the left turn. But I'm wondering whether I should go on trail and at least I might get rid of the ticket. The ticket was under 142(1)
I was told that if I go on court, both the guy I hit and the officer who…
question for a friend of mine.....says she got a 3 day suspension for giving a A on a roadside. Thing is she wasnt driving. She is a g2 driver and the car was parked in a parking lot, she just ran out to get something and turned the car on. Can a 3 day be issued if you arent driving on a highway - (I've read for impaired it doesnt matter, but 3 day isnt criminal)? And is there any way to…
I can't find the category for this post so I'm posting it here.
Two questions...
1. Are golf carts considered a 'vehicle' under the Highway traffic act? I know carts can't drive across roads or on roads but if you try to bring one from the USA into Canada they are considered a 'vehicle'.
2. If you are on private property are you allowed to carry 'opened' alcohol in your golf cart? I know golf…
I got pulled over (along with about 10 other cars) for going through a road closed sign. I had just pulled out of a parking lot pretty much right beside the road closed sign, and with about 4 cars behind me there wasn't much I could do but go through, so I think I have a good chance of fighting it. However, on my ticket under the Signature of issuing Provincial Offences Officer, it's left…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural area and I sometimes see vehicles doing mail delivery. The vehicle then started accelerating and…
I was pulled over yesterday in a community safety zone and told I was doing 84 in a 50. When i passed the officer I looked at my odometer and I was only doing 64. I was given a summons on the spot to appear in court at the end of June. Do I have any chance in this if it comes down to his word over mine. I was in the car alone but have travelled these same roads every day, twice a day for 6 years…
who is at fault when :a) a passenger opens door and jumps out of vehicle onto the road with traffic. b) he gets hit by a car travelling in the adjoining lane. c) traffic lights were green. d) pedestrian crossing was further up and indicated "no crossing" light e) the vehicle that he exited from leaves the scene as soon as accident occurred. f) no charges have been laid after police filed report…