I was involved in an accident recently and I was given a ticket of turn not in safety. I was wondering if anyone can help me the most effective way of fighting this ticket. I left work on a very snowy day and approached an intersection at the green light and proceeded into the middle of that intersection to make a left hand turn. I waited in the middle and then the light turned yellow. Two cars driving in the opposite direction came to a full stop. I saw a car that was further back in the opposite direction slowing down. The light turned red and then I proceeded with my left turn. I looked at the car that was supposed to have been slowing down, not actually stopping and swerving. He then hit my car on the passenger side with his driver side. A witness came to check if I was ok, and I asked him if he saw what happened. He confirmed that the other driver did come through the red light. The other driver did not come out of his car until the police arrived. I never had the opportunity to talk with him to see what his side of the story was. My witness needed to leave and I took his information down. When I was asked what had happened by the police officer, I gave him my story along with my witness information. The police officer questioned the other driver and then returned with a turn not in safety ticket to give me. When I asked why I was getting a ticket since I had a witness, he stated that the my witness said that he could no longer confirm that the light was red. I am upset that I was given a ticket for this and would like to fight it. What is the best way to win in this circumstance? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
I was involved in an accident recently and I was given a ticket of turn not in safety. I was wondering if anyone can help me the most effective way of fighting this ticket. I left work on a very snowy day and approached an intersection at the green light and proceeded into the middle of that intersection to make a left hand turn. I waited in the middle and then the light turned yellow. Two cars driving in the opposite direction came to a full stop. I saw a car that was further back in the opposite direction slowing down. The light turned red and then I proceeded with my left turn. I looked at the car that was supposed to have been slowing down, not actually stopping and swerving. He then hit my car on the passenger side with his driver side. A witness came to check if I was ok, and I asked him if he saw what happened. He confirmed that the other driver did come through the red light. The other driver did not come out of his car until the police arrived. I never had the opportunity to talk with him to see what his side of the story was. My witness needed to leave and I took his information down. When I was asked what had happened by the police officer, I gave him my story along with my witness information. The police officer questioned the other driver and then returned with a turn not in safety ticket to give me. When I asked why I was getting a ticket since I had a witness, he stated that the my witness said that he could no longer confirm that the light was red. I am upset that I was given a ticket for this and would like to fight it. What is the best way to win in this circumstance? Any help is greatly appreciated.
It is going to be a bit hard to win your case since you are the one making the left turn at the intersection and must ensure it is safe to do so before proceeding. As you mentioned, it was very snowy, so the other driver can simply state that they tried to stop but were sliding through the intersection due to the heavy snow. Now, that doesn't mean you shouldn't proceed to trial. Its possible that the other driver and witness might not show up to court--at which point the prosecution has no substantial evidence to rely on since the officer wasn't there to witness anything. Its also very important to know what the witness actually stated (when you get the disclosure--read his statement). If he says the other driver never made any attempt to stop whatsoever and ran the red light, that could help your case (with regards to attacking the other driver's credibility)-----but still, the case will turn on why you decided to proceed through the intersection (on a snowy day no less!) without waiting to make sure that it truly WAS safe to proceed (i.e. all cars were indeed stopped). After all, one can't just assume cars will be stopping---even for red lights. So, if I were you, I'd put the matter down for trial, and after getting your trial notice, request your disclosure. Read it over well so you know what weaknesses there are and then decide whether you wish to continue all the way to trial.
It is going to be a bit hard to win your case since you are the one making the left turn at the intersection and must ensure it is safe to do so before proceeding. As you mentioned, it was very snowy, so the other driver can simply state that they tried to stop but were sliding through the intersection due to the heavy snow.
Now, that doesn't mean you shouldn't proceed to trial. Its possible that the other driver and witness might not show up to court--at which point the prosecution has no substantial evidence to rely on since the officer wasn't there to witness anything. Its also very important to know what the witness actually stated (when you get the disclosure--read his statement). If he says the other driver never made any attempt to stop whatsoever and ran the red light, that could help your case (with regards to attacking the other driver's credibility)-----but still, the case will turn on why you decided to proceed through the intersection (on a snowy day no less!) without waiting to make sure that it truly WAS safe to proceed (i.e. all cars were indeed stopped). After all, one can't just assume cars will be stopping---even for red lights.
So, if I were you, I'd put the matter down for trial, and after getting your trial notice, request your disclosure. Read it over well so you know what weaknesses there are and then decide whether you wish to continue all the way to trial.
I was summoned to the Mississauga Court House as an independent witness for a Careless Driving charge, and I watched a 'Turn Not in Safety' trial unfold. The left turning driver collided with a speeding red light runner. Left turn driver told the courts there were three lanes of traffic ahead of him; vehicles in lane 1 and 3 were completely stopped; lane 2 was empty, and he used the words, "I didn't see any cars in that lane". The light turned red and he initiated the turn. Moments later a car appeared in lane 2, ran the red light and hit his left turning car. Nobody was hurt, the passenger in the left turning vehicle also corroborated his story. The driver who went straight through initially stated that he entered the intersection in what he claimed was a late amber, early red. Under cross-examination he later admitted he could've went through on a red. The JP ruled the left turn driver should've made sure that all lanes of traffic were stopped prior to proceeding; he has to anticipate cars that will run the red light, and that he should've waited longer. Had he waited a few more "moments" he could've made the turn in safety. Even if he's momentarily blocking cross-traffic who have the green light. This particular Mississauga JP found the left turn driver guilty of S.142 (1). The driver was also also self-represented, the JP spent time looking through case-law and a dictionary to help find the driver not-guilty. But the wording of S.142 (1) was not in his favour. _____________________________ @highwaystar is correct, you should still request a trial and there is a chance that the other driver and independent witness will not appear. If they don't, the charge will most likely get withdrawn.
I was summoned to the Mississauga Court House as an independent witness for a Careless Driving charge, and I watched a 'Turn Not in Safety' trial unfold. The left turning driver collided with a speeding red light runner. Left turn driver told the courts there were three lanes of traffic ahead of him; vehicles in lane 1 and 3 were completely stopped; lane 2 was empty, and he used the words, "I didn't see any cars in that lane". The light turned red and he initiated the turn.
Moments later a car appeared in lane 2, ran the red light and hit his left turning car. Nobody was hurt, the passenger in the left turning vehicle also corroborated his story.
The driver who went straight through initially stated that he entered the intersection in what he claimed was a late amber, early red. Under cross-examination he later admitted he could've went through on a red.
The JP ruled the left turn driver should've made sure that all lanes of traffic were stopped prior to proceeding; he has to anticipate cars that will run the red light, and that he should've waited longer. Had he waited a few more "moments" he could've made the turn in safety. Even if he's momentarily blocking cross-traffic who have the green light. This particular Mississauga JP found the left turn driver guilty of S.142 (1).
The driver was also also self-represented, the JP spent time looking through case-law and a dictionary to help find the driver not-guilty. But the wording of S.142 (1) was not in his favour.
_____________________________
@highwaystar is correct, you should still request a trial and there is a chance that the other driver and independent witness will not appear. If they don't, the charge will most likely get withdrawn.
Thanks so much for your advice. I am definitely going to choose to proceed with taking this ticket to trial but it is unfortunate that the officer did not state the weather conditions at the time and also my bad luck of my witness not confirming his orignal story. Would it be a good idea to choose option 2 (Early resolution) at this point and speak with the prosecutor? I am thinking that I could delay the court date a bit and take this option. Once I speak with the prosecutor and all that they offer me is a lessor fine, I can then decline and request a court date be set. I am hoping that my court date will then be later than it would be if I chose it right from the start. I am also hoping that it is delayed so that it will eat up some of the time that it takes for this ticket to be off my record (three years). Is this a good idea? Some additional questions I have are: 1) When I meet with the prosecutor, will they have the disclosure information a this point or do I need to request it for this meeting? Is the disclosure information only given when a court date is set? 2) If the other driver does not show up to court are they given a ticket for not showing up or is it their choice to be present? 3) I had a witness to the accident and wonder if this person will be automatically summoned to be present in court or would I have to ask him to attend? 4) Would it be beneficial to me to ask my witness to come and talk to the prosecutor with me?
Thanks so much for your advice. I am definitely going to choose to proceed with taking this ticket to trial but it is unfortunate that the officer did not state the weather conditions at the time and also my bad luck of my witness not confirming his orignal story. Would it be a good idea to choose option 2 (Early resolution) at this point and speak with the prosecutor? I am thinking that I could delay the court date a bit and take this option. Once I speak with the prosecutor and all that they offer me is a lessor fine, I can then decline and request a court date be set. I am hoping that my court date will then be later than it would be if I chose it right from the start. I am also hoping that it is delayed so that it will eat up some of the time that it takes for this ticket to be off my record (three years). Is this a good idea?
Some additional questions I have are:
1) When I meet with the prosecutor, will they have the disclosure information a this point or do I need to request it for this meeting? Is the disclosure information only given when a court date is set?
2) If the other driver does not show up to court are they given a ticket for not showing up or is it their choice to be present?
3) I had a witness to the accident and wonder if this person will be automatically summoned to be present in court or would I have to ask him to attend?
4) Would it be beneficial to me to ask my witness to come and talk to the prosecutor with me?
3 year clock starts on the date you're convicted not on the date you were charged. So prolonging the conviction date doesn't assist you unless you have other tickets on your record and you're looking to keep a 3-year separation to save on insurance premiums. The demerit points are the only benefit in prolonging the conviction date because that 2 year clock starts on the date you were charged. So if you're convicted two years after the charge, there would be no points on your record. Choosing Option 2 will not assist you with the 11b clock either, as it's currently being considered as a "neutral delay". You will need to request disclosure information prior to the meeting as per the SCC Stinchcombe guidelines. Normally the crown asks for a trial date with the request, you can include the first attendance meeting date instead. Ontario prosecutors require 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests. The other driver will face a $2000 fine and an arrest warrant where they could serve up to 30-days in jail for not appearing. If that witness is providing evidence in your favour, then you'll have to ask them to attend. If the officer took down their driver's license information at the scene, it's possible they might also be subpoenaed to your trial. You can also bring other witnesses who'll provide character evidence, "your employer, family, friends, doctor, teacher". If your witness is willing to talk to the prosecutor about your case, sure... at this point i don't think it would hurt you.
bellaladybug wrote:
Would it be a good idea to choose option 2 (Early resolution) at this point and speak with the prosecutor? I am thinking that I could delay the court date a bit and take this option. Once I speak with the prosecutor and all that they offer me is a lessor fine, I can then decline and request a court date be set. I am hoping that my court date will then be later than it would be if I chose it right from the start. I am also hoping that it is delayed so that it will eat up some of the time that it takes for this ticket to be off my record (three years). Is this a good idea?
3 year clock starts on the date you're convicted not on the date you were charged. So prolonging the conviction date doesn't assist you unless you have other tickets on your record and you're looking to keep a 3-year separation to save on insurance premiums. The demerit points are the only benefit in prolonging the conviction date because that 2 year clock starts on the date you were charged. So if you're convicted two years after the charge, there would be no points on your record.
Choosing Option 2 will not assist you with the 11b clock either, as it's currently being considered as a "neutral delay".
bellaladybug wrote:
Some additional questions I have are:
1) When I meet with the prosecutor, will they have the disclosure information a this point or do I need to request it for this meeting? Is the disclosure information only given when a court date is set?
You will need to request disclosure information prior to the meeting as per the SCC Stinchcombe guidelines. Normally the crown asks for a trial date with the request, you can include the first attendance meeting date instead. Ontario prosecutors require 6-8 weeks to process disclosure requests.
bellaladybug wrote:
2) If the other driver does not show up to court are they given a ticket for not showing up or is it their choice to be present?
The other driver will face a $2000 fine and an arrest warrant where they could serve up to 30-days in jail for not appearing.
bellaladybug wrote:
3) I had a witness to the accident and wonder if this person will be automatically summoned to be present in court or would I have to ask him to attend?
If that witness is providing evidence in your favour, then you'll have to ask them to attend. If the officer took down their driver's license information at the scene, it's possible they might also be subpoenaed to your trial. You can also bring other witnesses who'll provide character evidence, "your employer, family, friends, doctor, teacher".
bellaladybug wrote:
4) Would it be beneficial to me to ask my witness to come and talk to the prosecutor with me?
If your witness is willing to talk to the prosecutor about your case, sure... at this point i don't think it would hurt you.
The fine is not the issue but I am worried about insurance rates. First speeding ticket in my life Any suggestions on how to handle this? I can't afford to spend a day at the court
So was at court today in Orillia for a friend, and I had submitted a couple notice of motion a couple weeks ago that I wanted to deal with before arraignment. I met with prosecutor before hand, and it went something like this:
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law?"
Me: "What do you mean?"
Prosecutor: "Do you have the case law for your motion?"
Me: "All the case law is quoted in the motion that I…
1)failure to change address on license (i got married a couple of months earlier and moved)
2) license plate not fully visible
I got pulled over because I had 2 letters peeling off my license plate. I know ignorance isn't a defense, but I really had no idea that this was an issue. Plus, you see many cars on the road with peeling plates. I got both tickets and…
I was driving around 140km/h on a 100km/h posted on the highway. I was in the fast lane. The officer was very nice and reduced it to no points and just 15km/h over.
I only have my G2.
1. Will this affect me taking the G test next month?
2. I am very grateful for the officer lowering the ticket... should I just pay the 52.5$ and leave it as is.. I am a secondary driver under my dads name and we have…
Hi, thanks in advance for the help. Been driving for 10 years, clean record until today when I got slapped with two tickets. First: going 135 at 100 on the 401, second: not having a valid sticker (I recently moved and completely forgot about it)
My friend tells me I should fight the speed ticket, if anything to reduce the fine and points. Would be alot of help if anyone could walk me through…
My wife, who has never had a traffic ticket in her life, just got 11 points.
Two tickets: "following too closely" and "failure to stop"
She was on a residential street and was behind a car at a crosswalk waiting for a pedestrian. Pedestrian crossed, they continued. Cop was drivig towards them down a side street , and as they passed he went after my wife.
I was driving in mid lane and was following a line of cars around speed limit.
The vehicle in front of me was large and I decided to change to the left lane to get better line sight.
As soon as I entered the left lane, I saw the car in front of me approximately 200m away stopped dead (for some odd reason, there was more traffic on the left lane).
Over the last few months I have received several parking tickets from the City of Kitchener. I haven't paid any of them and have attempted to dicuss the situation with the parking authority of the City, however, they're very unreceptive and defensive.
I work at a downtown construction site....ironically a Court House. The site takes up a whole city block, of which ONE side has 2 hour parking…
I was driving on a teusday night in the rain and fog at whites and highview by St. Mary CSS in Pickering, ON. At the time I was waiting at a red light to make a left north onto whites. There was also a car on the opposite side of the intersection making a left. The cars beams were pointed almost directly at my face and as a result, with the combination of the rain and fog, I…
I am new to this website and this is my first post so please forgive me if I've put this question in the wrong place. Please bear with me until I learn the ropes a bit.
So here are my questions:
Antique cars and hot rods (1930's- early '60's) and seat belt use in Ontario. If these vehicles never came from the respective factories with any seat belts, do they have to be retrofitted ?
OK so Jshreck has been taking some heat for the concept of providing the DL as being not required and therefore inadmissable in court. Personally, I think that argument would fall on deaf ears in the lower court and any chance at victory would have to be in the highest court. That would be quite something. When pigs fly I think, but along that line of thought, allow me to continue.......
I have a court date soon and am wondering whether the officers just read off their disclosure notes when interrogated.
Basically, according to the disclosure notes and the said distances and speeds quoted, by doing some simple math it just doesn't add up. My concern is whether the officer can change his story when on the stand after maybe realizing this?
Last week I was driving home from college in the sauga area. I drive a 1995 Chevy Monte Carlo v6 which I've owned since 2000, I really haven't done anything to the car except tinted windows (not completely darken) and some rims, and Nothing Engine wise. Anyway I look in my rear view mirror and out of no where i see cherry flashing. When pulled over the officer asked do you…
I was charged 2 days ago with RED LIGHT - FAIL TO STOP and set fined $150 and I guess 3 points. I was driving turning left on the intersection with a traffic light, and when I jst about to turn left the light turned to orange and I didn't have enough time to stop. Once I turned I saw the light turned to red and 2seconds later I saw a police beacon flashing through my rear-view mirror. It…
I figured pleading not guilty is the same as saying it was signed which is stupid. A friend of mine told me I could plead guilty with explanation and try to get the fine reduced when I come in.
So this Friday I was stopped by a local officer for going 110 in a 80zone. He also claims I was going 105 in a 50zone,which we literally passed when he stopped me as I was braking. It has been 3 days already and I can't seem to locate my ticket on their Internet site "pay ticket". Is there a way to determine if he has filed for certificate of offence to the courts? It has been 3 days I presume…
My trial date is in a couple days for a speeding ticket (york region) and i am nervous it is my first ticket ever as well as first trial
I did notice my ticket was filed beyond 7 days, 10 days after the day i got the ticket to be exact, which is stamped on the ticket. is this enough to have it dismissed?
If you look close enough, beside the drivers' side "A" pillar you will see a white circle = front antenna of Genesis radar......plus look above the dash pad...there is the Spectre RDD.
Any suggestions on how to handle this? I can't afford to spend a day at the court 
