Last week, I was driving on a 2-lane country road over the 401 and began to slow down to turn left into a commuter parking lot where I pick up another child. I turned on my signal more than 30m prior to the left turn. There was a large pick-up behind me, and he turned on his signal to turn right onto the on-ramp for the highway. I did a left-shoulder check before beginning to turn left and it was clear, and there was noone ahead of me or coming towards me, but sometime between that time and completing my turn, a second pick-up truck two vehicles behind me assumed that I was also turning right onto the highway and pulled out to pass. When he realized I was turning left, he slammed on his breaks and I tried to swerve, but the front of my car and the right side of his truck collided. My car was totalled as a result (Honda Civic). He immediately came up to me and apologized profusely and said that it was all his fault and that he had assumed that I was turning right as well as the guy in between us. The police officer charged me with a left turn not in safety despite my not being able to see the vehicle pulling out behind the truck behind me. I knew that insurance would judge fault independently, but the other driver has now claimed that I hit him while "changing lanes." As a result of our stories not aligning, the insurance companies are now going to be using the police report to help determine what to do. And my insurance company has indicated that because I was the one charged, I would likely also be found at fault. So I'm confused. Is it worth me going to court to try to argue the charge/get it dropped if it is going to impact my insurance? Can I find out what the officer included in the police report? TIA
Last week, I was driving on a 2-lane country road over the 401 and began to slow down to turn left into a commuter parking lot where I pick up another child. I turned on my signal more than 30m prior to the left turn. There was a large pick-up behind me, and he turned on his signal to turn right onto the on-ramp for the highway. I did a left-shoulder check before beginning to turn left and it was clear, and there was noone ahead of me or coming towards me, but sometime between that time and completing my turn, a second pick-up truck two vehicles behind me assumed that I was also turning right onto the highway and pulled out to pass. When he realized I was turning left, he slammed on his breaks and I tried to swerve, but the front of my car and the right side of his truck collided. My car was totalled as a result (Honda Civic). He immediately came up to me and apologized profusely and said that it was all his fault and that he had assumed that I was turning right as well as the guy in between us. The police officer charged me with a left turn not in safety despite my not being able to see the vehicle pulling out behind the truck behind me.
I knew that insurance would judge fault independently, but the other driver has now claimed that I hit him while "changing lanes." As a result of our stories not aligning, the insurance companies are now going to be using the police report to help determine what to do. And my insurance company has indicated that because I was the one charged, I would likely also be found at fault. So I'm confused.
Is it worth me going to court to try to argue the charge/get it dropped if it is going to impact my insurance? Can I find out what the officer included in the police report?
Being found not guilty will not change the police report. I have had many people come up after and want the report changed after the court outcome. I have always said no and stood by the findings. You can contact the police and get a copy of the report. ops
Being found not guilty will not change the police report. I have had many people come up after and want the report changed after the court outcome. I have always said no and stood by the findings.
You can contact the police and get a copy of the report.
What does the police report show? Your version or the other drivers? If the police report agrees with your version of events, the other drive should be deemed at fault. Fault determination rules can be found here: http://www.ibc.ca/en/car_insurance/docu ... -rules.pdf Section 10(7) would appear to to describe your situation and lists the passing driver at 100% fault.
What does the police report show? Your version or the other drivers?
If the police report agrees with your version of events, the other drive should be deemed at fault.
Thank you for your help! I'm not sure yet what the police report indicates. I called the detachment on Saturday and am waiting to hear back about picking up a copy of the report. Thanks again!
Thank you for your help! I'm not sure yet what the police report indicates. I called the detachment on Saturday and am waiting to hear back about picking up a copy of the report.
Hi everyone. I'm asking for a friend who has a question of interpretation.
He was ticketed for using a hand-held device. He contends that he was acting within the exemption provided under Subsection 14 (1) of O. Reg. 366/09, which reads as follows (emphasis added):
Hey guys i just wanted to know what speeds you see others do on the roads on a regular basis. As we all know no body drives 100 km. It seems they only hit that speed twice once on the way up and once on the way down.
it seems the De Facto limit on the 401 is about 120-130. But lately i dont know if…
On June 10, 2017, I was pulled over by an OPP on the 403 heading WB and told I registered 136km/hr. I kept chit chat to a minimum and took my ticket and went on with my day. I later requested my disclosure and did not receive it until a week before my Oct. 27 court date, and so I had my date…
Anyone know any more information? Apparently kathleen wynne mentioned trying to introduce legislation after more than 20 years of no speed cameras. My guess is that it wont happen, since they've tried before many times to bring it back after it was abolished.
The other day I was given a ticket for speeding 119 in a 90, on highway 17 near Marathon, ON (Speeding ticket capital of the universe, BTW). The officer claims to have "clocked" me using the vehicle mounted radar at 121 KMH and dropped it (presumably to lower fine and demerits).
I posted this in the 3 Demerit Section and haven't received any
responses.
I received a failure to stop at an amber light ticket on April 17, 2009. At my First Attendance Meeting I asked to read the police officer's notes and remember thinking how ridiculous they were and the difficulty…
I was on the right side of the road going straight when a pedestrian waved down the taxi driver in the lane next to me. He pulled over to the right without any notice or signalling and hit me with the side of his car.
There were many witnesses but I immediately had a concussion and did not think of…
My mother was driving EB on a 4 lane street (2 lanes EB, 2 lanes WB).
She was in the left hand lane and started a left hand turn so as to enter a side street, crossing WB traffic. There was NO intersection. She hit a cyclist who was heading WB. Police where called but none showed up. My…
If the speed limit is 50, and you do 100+, not only do you get 6 points. Your car gets impounded for a week, and your license suspended for 7 days, along with a hefty fine of at least $2000. The penalty is actually the same as for racing. The law came in effect on October 1, 2007. Remember -…
I was driving westbound on Hwy. 8 earlier this month in North Dumfries Township, approaching the Cambridge city limits. The weather was clear and the roads were dry. I noticed a vehicle on the shoulder on my side of the road, pointing towards me. This didn't concern me right away, as it is a rural…
