I just didn't know if the notes are really "new evidence" since the officer reads them during their testimony. They were also disclosed to me at the hearing. The problem is the discrepancy between what was written and what was said during the officer's testimony and cross examination. There are some suspicious contradictions, but not all were articulated on the transcript during cross examination. The notes would be needed as evidence to expose all the discrepancies.

I wanted to know the rules in court if more than 1 police officer was involved in a speeding citation. For example, if two officers were present at the time of the alleged offence, but it's unclear which officer tested the laser device or used it. Only one officer appears on the front of the ticket, but another officer is referenced in the notes as having tested the equipment and sharing it at the time of the offense. Only one showed up in court in BC, but I was still convicted. I am appealing, but under oath my officer testified that she herself tested the unit. I did ask if she shared her un...