The case you're referring that gained media attention was commonly titled everywhere as "Is a three-point turn a U-turn?". It's where a Brampton man driving north, turned left into a driveway, reversed his car and proceeded south. He was found guilty. Section 143 of the Highway Traffic Ac...

I think you're actually in a very solid position. I seem to recall reading about a similar situation recently (I believe it was in the news?). Anyway, the gentleman in that case was charged with same having turned, pulled into a driveway and then backed up. Having said that, you stopped for 15 secon...

I think you have it backwards.

The By-Law on the books is 555-00 but the By-Law written by hand on the offence notice is 555/2000.

That would make them the same thing?

Edit: the latter (to me) looks like 555 out of 2000.

Earlier today I received an offence notice in the city of Mississauga. Rather than a charge under HTA the officer issued a charge under City of Mississauga By-Law 555/2000. The correct By-Law is 555-00 so I'm wondering if this is a fatal error and/or an error that will allow me to have the charge wi...