Search found 32 matches
- Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:54 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4096
Re: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be
Ok, so the ticket is right if it shows $75 as the set fine, with a total payable of $95? 20 x $3.75 = $75 set fine + $15 VFS + $5 service cost = $95 total payable If the HTA table was used, it would be: 20 x $4.50 = $90 set fine + $20 VFS + $5 service cost = $115 total payable I was thinking a Londo...
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:40 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4096
Speeding - what should the set fine and total payable be?
Hi, A friend got a ticket Jan. 9th of this year for doing 110 kph in a 90 kph zone, so 20 over. What should the set fine and total payable read? It's confusing to me, as the prescribed fine under HTA s.128 is different than the set fine enumerated by the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court of Justice...
- Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:56 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: My successful 11b carter motion
- Replies: 20
- Views: 17515
The prosecution does have grounds to bring you back to court for a retrial. The charges have been stayed, and there is no statue of limitations for them to challenge you or revise the stayed decision. When you file a charter motion to get the charges stayed.. It basically means you want the charge ...
- Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:50 pm
- Forum: Following too closely
- Topic: My day in court fighting a FTC ticket
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4177
My day in court fighting a FTC ticket
Court was for 9 am … after the prosecutor had talked to everyone that was there, it was near 9:45! I would guess there were 25 people there, and only I asked for a trial (well, there was another, but she soon took a plea). The prosecutor at first offered to swap the FTC for an "unsa...
- Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:25 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: R vs White Defence
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4155
- Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:02 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3728
- Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:28 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3728
Is this disclosure request form ok? http://respect.to/wiki/pmwiki.php?n=LegalInfo.RequestForDisclosureForm As for the 4F template, that's when I submit a request for stay of charges (11(b)), at least two weeks before the trial date, right? Thanks! As for the disclosure form, looks fine to me. I wou...
- Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:16 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: List of errors that are fatal in a POA ss. 9/9.1 setting
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3909
For anyone new to this thread, this is how it played out.Simon Borys wrote:Not sure but I'm interested to hear what comes of this.
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 3:51 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3728
- Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:22 am
- Forum: Following too closely
- Topic: Following too closely ticket with contact
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8840
R. v. Reiber, 2007 ONCJ 343 , para 15: In R v Smith, [2002] OJ No 3270, Halikowski J, sitting as a POA appellate court accepted the necessity of having all of the essential elements of the included offence as part of the original offence. In that decision, the court at paragraph 8 stated: Mr. Smith...
- Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:04 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: 13 months = stay of charges?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3728
Re: 13 months = stay of charges?
I got this ticket in November of 2009 and requested a trial date. I haven't receiving any notification yet. It's been almost 10 months. So today I visited the court office and the lady searched the system. She says there's a date for the trial, end of December of 2010. That's going to be 13 months....
- Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:28 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: My experience with a s.135 POA appeal
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6314
My experience with a s.135 POA appeal
My experience with a s.135 POA appeal First, the short strokes for those that like to skim: 1. Got a ticket for Fail to Have Insurance Card 2. Total payable for that should be $65 ($50 set fine + $10 victim fine s/c + $5 costs for servicing of ticket), it was written as $60 3. Seeing this, I delibe...
- Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:39 pm
- Forum: Following too closely
- Topic: Following too closely ticket with contact
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8840
If you are charged with FTC, and it's clear from the evidence that really you were just driving carelessly, then there's no way they can convict on FTC, and no way that they can substitute a Careless Driving charge for the FTC (definitely no way after 6 mos from the offence date). If you are charged...
- Wed May 05, 2010 2:44 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Fatal Error on the Ticket
- Replies: 22
- Views: 15679
what if the speed limit is posted at 70km but the ticket said 60km? would the ticket be wrong? Yes the ticket is wrong, but you will have to prove it. how would i prove this with pictures? video? so who needs to take the pictures? can it be myself? if i can prove it is wrong do i win the case? The ...
- Tue May 04, 2010 7:23 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Sppeeding Ticket Error!
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1698
Respectfully disagree........ This mistake does not set out proper offence and the certificate should be quashed rather than amended. Personally, I would let this ticket go FTR (fail to respond) and file an appeal to get this matter quashed. Agreed. Any JP looking at this should quash it right away...