Search found 64 matches
- Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:31 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Attempted Car Theft
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2333
Re: Attempted Car Theft
One of the officers may correct me if I'm wrong but I seem to remember from high school law that there is are steps that much be followed in order to officially place somebody under arrest and under citizens arrest. I think it was something along the lines of you must declare who you are and why you are arresting them and then you must physically ...
- Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:47 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Passengers on the bed of a truck
- Replies: 14
- Views: 21643
Re: Passengers on the bed of a truck
Not adding any info, but I asked three different officers (2 Ottawa police and 1 OPP and received 3 divergent opinions).
Well I think this answers the question. Depending on the officer you may or may not get away with it without getting a ticket so you'll have to weigh your options on this one. If only all laws could be this black and white ...
Well I think this answers the question. Depending on the officer you may or may not get away with it without getting a ticket so you'll have to weigh your options on this one. If only all laws could be this black and white ...
- Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:52 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: LEFT MY WALLET AT HOME
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2181
Re: LEFT MY WALLET AT HOME
Best bet would be to bring the updated documents with you to the prosecutor and see what they'll do for you. I imagine you should at the very least be able to get one dropped assuming you're apologetic and polite.
- Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:41 pm
- Forum: Driving While Suspended
- Topic: Vehicle Immobilizer
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7325
Re: Vehicle Immobilizer
"Ignorant" - lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated.
PS I just thought I'd mention that even though I don't currently own an overpriced car, I sure do enjoy being able to drive the car I have!
PS I just thought I'd mention that even though I don't currently own an overpriced car, I sure do enjoy being able to drive the car I have!
- Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:49 pm
- Forum: Driving While Suspended
- Topic: Vehicle Immobilizer
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7325
Re: Vehicle Immobilizer
That is the typical, uneduated, unsympathetic reply I would expect from some bone head who hasn't learnt his lesson...NotAcriminal wrote:That is the typical uneducated, unsympathetic reply I would expect from a cop.
Just saying.
- Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:47 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 50 km/h or more
- Topic: 116kmh on a 60 - help!
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3404
Re: 116kmh on a 60 - help!
Stunt driving knocked down to 15km/h over at roadside! That can happen? You should realize you were given a HUGE break and there's a good chance if you take it to trial the prosecutor won't be too happy that you're looking for a further reduction and amend it back up to 116 in a 60.
My suggestion if you feel brave: at the first attendance bring ...
My suggestion if you feel brave: at the first attendance bring ...
- Fri May 28, 2010 10:07 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Prosecutor appealing my dismissal
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6375
Re: Prosecutor appealing my dismissal
I don't know about you, but I sure feel great knowing that money is being to have this prosecutor go to appeals court over this case. Why even waste the resources fighting this even further from the city's perspective? You must have made that prosecutor look really dumb in court or maybe you looked at him the wrong way... 
- Sat May 08, 2010 11:39 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Computer in view if driver
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5022
Re: Computer in view if driver
HTA 78(1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway if the display screen of a television, computer or other device in the motor vehicle is visible to the driver
I read this as: if my passenger is using their mp3 player in the front seat, I can get a ticket if I can just SEE their screen. It doesn't even say the screen needs to be on ...
I read this as: if my passenger is using their mp3 player in the front seat, I can get a ticket if I can just SEE their screen. It doesn't even say the screen needs to be on ...
- Fri May 07, 2010 7:32 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Forced to abandon appeal.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2421
Re: Forced to abandon appeal.
Okay in regards to your inquiry you should know that in Canada our civil law system isn't any where near as F***ed as our neighbours to the South. In Canada you are typically only able to collect two different kinds of damages: special and general damages.
Special damages are those which compensate for quantifiable injuries, things that a dollar ...
Special damages are those which compensate for quantifiable injuries, things that a dollar ...
- Thu May 06, 2010 7:02 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Forced to abandon appeal.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2421
Re: Forced to abandon appeal.
Just to clarify: by opening a suit, do you mean you're thinking of suing?ManlyMinute wrote: And on a more serious note, can I open a suit against the department because the officer forged my witness statement, admitted to it, and may have therefore commited pergury? (This is an exploritory question so please don't grill me.)
- Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:35 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Ticket of G2 License with BAC above zero ?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6312
Re: Ticket of G2 License with BAC above zero ?
Will it go on my record at all? And do I get charged anymore than the $110.00? And would this affect my insurance?
Also, if I fight it, does it get cleared completely off my record and if I fight it does it still affect my insurance?
I was also wondering, when going to fight it, in this situation would I need a lawyer? I assume I could just go ...
- Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:10 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Forced to speed up 111 on 90.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3827
Re: Forced to speed up 111 on 90.
Should have break checked him.
That's also stunt driving per O. Reg 455/07:
True but its not what you know its what you can prove. It would be hard to prove intent.
Very true, it's probably harder to prove in court. That said, I still find it scary that my car can get impounded and I'd have to pay towing + impound fees even if intent can't ...
That's also stunt driving per O. Reg 455/07:
True but its not what you know its what you can prove. It would be hard to prove intent.
Very true, it's probably harder to prove in court. That said, I still find it scary that my car can get impounded and I'd have to pay towing + impound fees even if intent can't ...
- Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:36 am
- Forum: Bylaws Pertaining to Traffic
- Topic: Just received my disclosure in the mail.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4577
Re: Just received my disclosure in the mail.
Sunk costs shouldn't be considered when making decisions about the future. Economics 101.JohnnyKickass wrote:Ok I know it's just $20 but with two days off work already and gas (court is in another city) I'm sure I'm down $400 by now.
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:16 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: serious defence for serial ticketers.
- Replies: 67
- Views: 18871
Re: great I like that reply
There are tools out there that say they can detect radar or lidars. I don't know if it has to actually hit your car or not to be detected. Then you can record the time. At least you might be able to date and time stamp.
This could work if you don't mind fighting one extra ticket because radar detectors are illegal in Ontario. But hey you're ...
This could work if you don't mind fighting one extra ticket because radar detectors are illegal in Ontario. But hey you're ...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:38 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: "Bilingual Defence" - Where it can be used
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8217
Re: "Bilingual Defence" - Where it can be used
Oh noes,
I'm wondering if I have grounds to request a Stay under 11b of the Charter ? The new court date will place me at 16 months when I go to trial again. Seems unreasonable ...
You can always request an 11b it's just whether or not the JP accepts your argument. 16 months puts you in a pretty good position unless you have caused a delay in ...
I'm wondering if I have grounds to request a Stay under 11b of the Charter ? The new court date will place me at 16 months when I go to trial again. Seems unreasonable ...
You can always request an 11b it's just whether or not the JP accepts your argument. 16 months puts you in a pretty good position unless you have caused a delay in ...