Viewing profile - Rdlz82
-
- Rdlz82’s recent activity
- Replies
- Views
- Date
-
-
Re: Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law
Simon Borys wrote:When I had a person claiming their fog lights were head lights for the purpose of 62(1), I charged under O/Reg 596 s. 2(1) for the l… - 12 Replies
- 15742 Views
- Last post Tue Apr 26, 2011 4:57 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law
Hi Stanton, The reason I'm saying that my ticket should not be valid is based on the fact that the officer gave me that ticket on the incorrect perce… - 12 Replies
- 15742 Views
- Last post Sun Apr 24, 2011 1:12 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Driving without Headlights...Interpretation of Law
So my luck (and arrogance) has finally run out. But I still need to understand if I'm interpreting Section 62(1) correctly. Background: I've been dri… - 12 Replies
- 15742 Views
- Last post Sat Apr 23, 2011 1:50 am View the latest post
-