Thanks for the responses. To answer some of the questions: The device used is a laser, not a radar - so based on what some of you said, it is much more accurate and seems like less wiggle room to argue. Yes it is an e-ticket and the disclosure is in a electronic form (not notes, or notes converted to text) and there is no time stamp on the e-ticket/notes, just the offense time with the date. At early resolution they did offer the lesser charge of 29km over instead of the current 43km over. Still wondering if using a laser gun is a strong enough argument that, even with no notes for the offer t...

Here is what is included in the disclosure word for word: Disclosure: sat sun/mild p-50z laser Atlanta 22615 tested 0730hrs ok icc/ist/rat 32m-39.6/h-v 74m s/b p/l 93 137m locc retest 1100 Ticket Details: Offence Time: 0819 Location: S/B Bathurst Municipality: Toronto Speeding 93km in a 50km zone HTA Section 128 Actual Speed: 93 Speed Charged for: 93 Speed Limit: 50 Additional Information: Motor Vehicle Involved: Y Collision Involved: N Witnesses: N Memo Book Notes w/ Evidence: N In-Car Video of Offence: N Conversation Audio Only: N Thoughts? This information and the radar gun manual were all ...

Got a ticket for going 40km over the limit, by an officer using a hand held "Laser Atlanta" radar gun on from the sidewalk. In the disclosure the officer has only recorded the calibration tests performed less than an hour before, and the weather. Other than the direction and street, there is no other information in the disclosure (no audio, witnesses, video, notes about the surroundings, or any other notes). I was provided with a manual for calibrating the radar gun. Given that I was on a busy street headed southbound into Toronto, there were other vehicles around me. With the lack o...