Viewing profile - avialaw
-
- avialaw’s recent activity
- Replies
- Views
- Date
-
-
Re: Failure to weigh evidence
jsherk wrote:Awesome Congratulations on the win! Thanks - 8 Replies
- 2444 Views
- Last post Thu May 04, 2017 11:45 am View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Failure to weigh evidence
So just to close this chapter - I've had my defence ready, adding to it R v. WD in terms of a three pronged test, and planning to talk about judicial … - 8 Replies
- 2444 Views
- Last post Thu May 04, 2017 10:12 am View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Failure to weigh evidence
Just found something interesting, by starting to re-read the transcript. After being booted out of the court room, to have the officer explain his sho… - 8 Replies
- 2444 Views
- Last post Mon May 01, 2017 7:12 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: Failure to weigh evidence
To answer both questions: I took the stand, and I've offered evidence, describing the road conditions, and the events leading to the eventual stop. I… - 8 Replies
- 2444 Views
- Last post Mon May 01, 2017 7:08 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Failure to weigh evidence
I have an appeal coming up, on a speeding ticket (HTA 128). The reason for my appeal is that the JP in the original trial said that I've provided no … - 8 Replies
- 2444 Views
- Last post Mon May 01, 2017 12:50 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up
bend wrote:avialaw wrote:@bend - the JP has agreed, on record, with me being entitled to a typed version and an explanation of the shorthand. The rea… - 7 Replies
- 2018 Views
- Last post Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:42 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up
@bend - the JP has agreed, on record, with me being entitled to a typed version and an explanation of the shorthand. @highwaystar - thank you. @scr… - 7 Replies
- 2018 Views
- Last post Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:38 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
No disclosure after an adjournment - trial coming up
Folks, My alleged offence is rather simple - speeding 134km/h in a 100km/h zone (quoted from the ticket). Offence took place in Nov 2015. First appe… - 7 Replies
- 2018 Views
- Last post Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:29 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy
I've decided not to risk it, given what I've seen and heard the JP do for the first little while today, so I've gone the route of getting an adjournme… - 16 Replies
- 4483 Views
- Last post Tue May 24, 2016 9:21 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy
I've done my share of digging on the fatal flow, prior to jsherk's reply, and I guess what causes me concern is that the issue was addressed in Khosha… - 16 Replies
- 4483 Views
- Last post Mon May 23, 2016 9:31 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy
Brilliant, thank you very much for the quick response This may be a stupid question, however how would I find out I've been convicted (if the JP doe… - 16 Replies
- 4483 Views
- Last post Mon May 23, 2016 12:20 pm View the latest post
-
-
-
Re: 34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy
Wow, the speed of everyone's answers is highly appreciated (as the trial is tomorrow). Here is my ticket - all thoughts are appreciated. QScan0523201… - 16 Replies
- 4483 Views
- Last post Mon May 23, 2016 10:30 am View the latest post
-
-
-
34 over, subsection question and notes discrepancy
Folks, My alleged offence is rather simple - speeding 134km/h in a 100km/h zone (quoted from the ticket). After reading all the vast troves of info … - 16 Replies
- 4483 Views
- Last post Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 pm View the latest post
-