Your best bet would be to go to first attendance, they will probably knock it down to zero points and a lesser fine.
DJ
Search found 4 matches
- Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:13 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Moore St near Bayview (HTA 182 (2)) A couple of questions...
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2249
- Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:10 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) What is the definition?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3987
Just an update for anyone interested. I went to my first attendance meeting and I was really expecting a horror show from a time/organizational standpoint, but I must say it was very smooth. I was at the court at Markham and Milner. Had a 3pm appointment and the JOP was very fast with the people. Sh...
- Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:22 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) What is the definition?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3987
I don't see lane/pavement markers listed in your link. Are lane/pavement markers considered signs?hwybear wrote:any sign that is listed in HTA Oregulation 615 can receive this offence notice.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... 0615_e.htm
Thanks,
DJ
- Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:47 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) What is the definition?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3987
Disobey Sign HTA 182(2) What is the definition?
Hello all, new to the board. Wish I had found this sooner as I have got my share of tickets over the years. Anyways, without getting into the details, I was just wondering if someone has an exact definiton of HTA section 182(2). I was chareged under that section, yet there was no sign up and still t...