True but Mississauga and Newmarket are not adjacent.

englebs001 wrote:BUMPPPP I'm gonna file this on Monday but I'm still lost.

Follow jsherk's instructions. Come back when you've received disclosure and post what you received.

I don't blame the JP for not believing you. You're clearly doing your best to minimize any responsibility you have in this matter. If it is that transparent in a text post on the internet, no wonder they saw right through you.

Did you mean you got the ticket in October 2015 or October 2016? That makes a bit of a difference for you.

Based on what you've written, I gather you haven't received disclosure yet. Get that and review it before you make assumptions like the one's you've made. I suspect, although I've been wrong before, that once you receive disclosure most of your "concerns" will not be as helpful to you as y...

The officer will also have the curb weight from the MTO registration. I did a quick search and it appears the curb weight is over 3000kg which is likely the basis of the ticket.

What kind of vehicle were you driving? What is the RGW?

Just so we can all understand the situation better can you fill in some of the blanks here? -What was the offence date and what was the charge? Are we talking HTA or other provincial offences? -Was your only court date in August of last year or have there been others? Please list all court dates and...

When considering an 11b application the justice will determine how much of the delay is due to the actions of the crown and the defendant. If you request this adjournment, the delay caused by it would not be counted toward the total delay for the purposes of the 11b application.

Personal opinion, but I think that video shows careless driving and if I were you I wouldn't bring it anywhere near the courtroom.

It's really not a good idea to have her testify.

Have you received disclosure? If so please post it so we can better assist you.

How does your wife know she wasn't speeding?

Just a quick note, I have HEARD, but not actually SEEN that certain jurisdictions will plead this down to a lesser charge. No idea if your jurisdiction is one of those that may be willing to make a deal.

Sounds like he was charged with Impaired Operation and Operation over 80. Wouldn't be surprised if they also tacked on Dangerous Operation, all three of which are criminal charges.

These cases are highly complex. He'll want to get a lawyer to represent him.

Unless the OP is not telling us something. I'd bet the disclosure for this case will be revealing.

Before i got the disclosure, i wanted to fight the ticket by arguing that 1) the speed recorded with the LIDAR was not my speed as there was other cars around me at the time, Just a quick note, this defence won't likely fly as LIDAR has a very narrow beam. This is in contrast to RADAR where the bea...