From TC's website:
The cost of the transcript depends on how long your trial was. The longer it took, the greater the amount to be transcribed. You will be asked to pay a nominal $25 deposit to start the process. When the reporter examines the recording, she will provide an estimate that you will have to pay. It will cost a minimum of $60 to ...
Search found 51 matches
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 7:26 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
- Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:39 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
I just learned how much it cost to file an appeal. Forget it, no way.
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:21 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
If I file an appeal, can I drop it before it goes to court if I change my mind? I'm not sure I should be fighting this, as I have more pressing things in my life to deal with right now. But I'm getting hooked on this. I'd like to keep my options open on fighting this.
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 4:35 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
OK, I've spent some time with the HTA and POA and I can't find any mention of the crown being required to provide a by-law for moving violations. I think that whoever though up this strategy might have it confused with with the requirement for a by-law in respect to parking violations:
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws ...
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws ...
- Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:52 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
I'm not sure I am capable of handling an appeal myself. I didn't conduct myself too well in court due to my inexperience. And I have read several members here post that an defendant should hire a professional to appeal a decision. That simply isn't an option for me right now.
I will give some thought about appealing, but I feel that I would first ...
I will give some thought about appealing, but I feel that I would first ...
- Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:19 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
I tried this defence and lost. I argued that contrary to HTA 137(a) the town had not passed a by-law authorizing the erection of the stop sign that I had been charged with failing to stop for. The Justice asked me how I knew this and I explained how my town had a website were you could review by-laws passed by council. Then she asked me for proof ...
- Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:46 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10315
Re: Do all traffic signs require a by-law?
I'm resurrecting the dead because I had the same question and just found the answer from one of ticketcombat's posts. The crown cannot not serve disclosure at the last minute:
Second,in R. v. Egger, [1993] (2 S.C.R. 451), the Supreme Court stated "disclosure must be made early enough to leave the accused enough time to take any steps that may ...
Second,in R. v. Egger, [1993] (2 S.C.R. 451), the Supreme Court stated "disclosure must be made early enough to leave the accused enough time to take any steps that may ...
- Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:05 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8315
Re: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
You did not and cannot post an Act that allows a city to issue tickets on private property.
Section 100 and 100.1 of the Municpal Act come close but in my view don't apply.
First, is a parking area within a condo considered "land"?
A condo is also not a parking lot within the meaning of s. 100, it is a condo that also provides parking spaces ...
Section 100 and 100.1 of the Municpal Act come close but in my view don't apply.
First, is a parking area within a condo considered "land"?
A condo is also not a parking lot within the meaning of s. 100, it is a condo that also provides parking spaces ...
- Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:55 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8315
Re: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
If you believe that the city can't issue tickets on private property (when given permission by the property owner), why not park your car in a condo parking lot and try it out yourself. Fight the ticket in court and let us know how it turns out.
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:14 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8315
Re: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
You should also consider organizing either:
1) A coup to elect yourself and your friends to the board so you can fix the bylaws.
2) Organize a bylaw change to specificially allow 2 your situation.
Good points. Even is the OP succeeds in a lawsuit, the board of directors can move to amend the bylaws to prohibit the parking of 2 vehicles in one ...
1) A coup to elect yourself and your friends to the board so you can fix the bylaws.
2) Organize a bylaw change to specificially allow 2 your situation.
Good points. Even is the OP succeeds in a lawsuit, the board of directors can move to amend the bylaws to prohibit the parking of 2 vehicles in one ...
- Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:07 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8315
Re: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
If the building is not owned by the city then the Toronto Parking Authority has no jurisdiction to issue parking tickets on private property.
Wrong. The corporation can grant the parking authority permission to issue tickets on it's property. In fact, management firms usually use security firms that are licensed by the parking authority to ...
- Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:17 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8315
Re: 2 smart cars share condo underground parking spot, ticketed
Fight the ticket, sure. But there is no need to go to court against your building yet. Simply bypass the property manager and take you issue up with the building's board of directors. Let them know that there is no no clause in the corporation's bylaws that state one space = one car. Let them know that you are willing to see it play out in court ...
- Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:37 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Improper disclosure – What would you do?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3618
Re: Improper disclosure – What would you do?
Well I'm confused then. I've read a number of posts here that say the crown must provide a municipal bylaw that authorized the placement of the stop sign. Otherwise, how can the sign be legal? I'm searching CanLii, but I haven't found anything yet. I'll let everyone know how it turns out in court.
- Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:25 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Improper disclosure – What would you do?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3618
Re: Improper disclosure – What would you do?
OK, if this did end up going to trial, can the crown introduce evidence at trial that was not included in disclosure? Like introducing the by-law at the last minute?
- Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:37 pm
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Improper disclosure – What would you do?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3618
Improper disclosure – What would you do?
I got pinched for a stop sign offence back in the spring. I requested disclosure using the template provided on Ticket Combat's site. The package I received from the prosecutor did not include a copy of the municipal by-law for that stop sign. Since my court date is one month away, I thought I should get my request to stay the proceeding ready, but ...
- Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:36 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Official Sign 151(1)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3637
Re: Disobey Official Sign 151(1)
Does French services act apply to York Region?
OK, I just checked. You can't use the French defense in York.
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic569.html
OK, I just checked. You can't use the French defense in York.
http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com/topic569.html
- Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:48 pm
- Forum: Improper left turn
- Topic: Improper left turn / failure to yield
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7360
Re: Improper left turn / failure to yield
LOL, nice reach. I wish I had thought of that one!Radar Identified wrote: By the way, did your husband use a hand signal to indicate he was turning left since his turn signals were not working?
- Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:44 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signal
- Topic: Stop Sign ticket question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2845
Re: Stop Sign ticket question
Such is case always.symcor wrote: he is there because complain by the resident.
Your girlfriend is not a witness because she was in the car with you. Your passenger never counts as a witness (usually, I think).
- Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:35 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Disobey Official Sign 151(1)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3637
Re: Disobey Official Sign 151(1)
I don't think the officer has to supply you with any notes. Disclosure can simply be a copy of the ticket from what I've read. Maybe someone else can tell me wrong.
- Sat Jun 27, 2009 7:11 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: York Regions Prosecutors Office fax#
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4484
Re: York Regions Prosecutors Office fax#
Provincial Offenses Office 465 Davis Drive, Newmarket = 905 895-3768 (fax)
- Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:51 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Cop suspended with Pay, HTA 172
- Replies: 67
- Views: 31006
Re: Cop suspended with Pay, HTA 172
I'm going to say yes. They could sue for malicious prosecution. I think the Sergeant himself would probably be on the hook for some of it.
I'm not sure about the officer ever paying a dime. Ontario labour law would come into effect. I think it says something like... an employee cannot be charged (monetary, not criminal) for a mistake they made ...
- Sun May 31, 2009 6:36 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Cop suspended with Pay, HTA 172
- Replies: 67
- Views: 31006
Re: Cop suspended with Pay, HTA 172
Are police officers with a criminal record allowed to keep their job in Ontario?
- Sun May 24, 2009 12:53 pm
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: bumping the back of a cop's wife's car = careless driving
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3530
Re: bumping the back of a cop's wife's car = careless driving
Why did police lay charges in the first place? Just because this woman tells them a story, they believe her word, end of story?
When my mother was hit, the police at the collision center would not pursue the matter because they said that it was her word of events against his (the other driver that fled the scene)
When my mother was hit, the police at the collision center would not pursue the matter because they said that it was her word of events against his (the other driver that fled the scene)
- Sun May 24, 2009 9:14 am
- Forum: Careless Driving
- Topic: bumping the back of a cop's wife's car = careless driving
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3530
Re: bumping the back of a cop's wife's car = careless driving
Interesting story. I wonder how she got the police to call you, let along charge you. I lent my car to my mother a few years ago. Some guy rear ended her in a parking lot and took off. The back was smashed up pretty bad. She called it in, then took it to a collision reporting office. We never got any action on the mater. I had to pay almost $1k to ...
- Sun May 24, 2009 9:03 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: HTA 144 (9) - Time issue
- Replies: 41
- Views: 13604
Re: HTA 144 (9) - Time issue
You might want to send the disclosure request by registered mail. I did this recently and it took a lot off my mind. Now I don't have to worry about if they got it or not. No surprises for me later on.
- Thu May 21, 2009 8:54 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Electronic Device Legislation
- Replies: 32
- Views: 41672
Re: Electronic Device Legislation
I have a computer mount in my van but I always remove the laptop before I start the car and place it behind my seat. I don't want to take the risk of having an accident and then be charged with distracted driving just because an officer noticed the laptop and decided to make an assumption that I was at fault since I was probably messing about with ...
- Sun May 17, 2009 6:34 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Failure to surrender insurance
- Replies: 24
- Views: 8067
Re: Failure to surrender insurance
Must surrender a valid insurance card upon demand. And that is when asked to surrender, not after the officer goes back to cruiser and returns to the car.
The officer that wrote me up came back from his cruiser with tickets in hand, then asked me if I had found my insurance before he handed me the tickets. So he actually was providing me a ...
- Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:49 pm
- Forum: Police Cruisers and Vehicles
- Topic: Early Morning Photo OPP B&W
- Replies: 26
- Views: 10689
Re: Early Morning Photo OPP B&W
Electrochromatic. They used to be widely available for purchase about 10 years ago. Most of the companies selling them have since mysteriously gone out of business.FiReSTaRT wrote: 5) Heard something about darkening plate covers but I haven't seen anyone use one of those.
- Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:14 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Suspicious car on the street
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2899
Re: Suspicious car on the street
They could be leeching off an open AP. There's no need to keep the engine running to run a computer, but people are dumb.
- Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:06 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Stop Sign-First appearance- Error on ticket. Chance to win?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 6924
Re: Stop Sign-First appearance- Error on ticket. Chance to win?
You said that the prosecutor helped you speak to a lawyer. Did she introduce you to this lawyer?