whaddyaknow wrote:Just to clarify, did the Prosecutor withdraw the charge, or were you found not guilty?

Withdrawn (I wanted to have a trial... denied).

There is no correlation between your tickets and the signs going up. It takes waaaaaaaaaaaaay longer for things to happen. That's just a coincidence so I wouldn't waste too much mental energy on that aspect of this. This (the signs going up) was actually the entire case. The signs were not in accor...

This is an interesting case. There must be previous case law more relevant to R. v Hajivasilis as this case deals with a Crown obtaining an appeal for leaving the scene of an accident. However infractions for stickers on private property. Tim Hortons is a rather bad example. If it was written: Someo...

Congratualtions on winning! What the law says is that it is ASSUMED the posted speed limit sign is correct UNLESS you can prove otherwise. So if there is NO by-law at all, then the speed of the road is assumed to be either 50 or 80, and a sign showing either 50 or 80 would be correct. A sign showin...

What the exact charge? What speed in what posted zone? Exact charge was posted 50 speeding 60 (reduced). I beat this in court the entire road was not in accordance with the by-law for 10 years. Took me almost 30 days just to get a copy of such by-laws. (Crazy) Was able to get records case was throw...

There is no correlation between your tickets and the signs going up. It takes waaaaaaaaaaaaay longer for things to happen. That's just a coincidence so I wouldn't waste too much mental energy on that aspect of this. This (the signs going up) was actually the entire case. The signs were not in accor...

In a nutshell, the maximum speed limit is 50 km/h unless posted otherwise. So you can not use the argument of no sign was posted if he charged you with speeding in a 50 zone, if he charged you with speeding in a 40 zone, that is a different discussion. You have not mentioned what rate you were char...