Hi there everybody, So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge. First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior? I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind. Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this? Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
Hi there everybody,
So as the title says, I made the bad decision to drive 180 in a 100 zone. It happened on Highway 400, a little north of Barrie around 11:30pm on a Friday Night. I've got some questions about how to deal with this charge.
First off, the charge and the ticket itself makes no mention of the actual speed I was going. How will the court know I was going 80 over as opposed to just 50 over? Will the officer need to testify that himself or does the court receive this information from him prior?
I've seen a lot of people on this message board make recommendations to get a paralegal for representation - Is this for cases where there is some ambiguity and/or departure from the typical protocol for being legitimately charged with racing a motor vehicle? Or is it just generally a better idea to have a paralegal argue your case, for the sake of reducing the fine, the charge, etc
I ask the paralegal question because I am debating whether I should represent myself in court or pay to have somebody represent me. While I realize that the speed I was going was irresponsible and that whatever penalties I end up facing will be what I deserve in this case - I think that I could do a decent job representing myself. I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to). My driving record is mostly clean, I believe I only have one ticket in the last three years - failing to present a license, although it unfortunately resulted in a driving suspension as the ticket went unpaid. And finally - I don't know what this will be worth in court - the officer seemed to empathize with me and was generally very kind.
Now maybe I'm kidding myself and all of the above isn't anything remotely close to a good defence. Either way, if I have nothing else, should I still bother with a paralegal? Does anybody know how much they generally cost to defend a case like this?
Very appreciative of any help, thanks guys and gals.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance. As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
You could have a first attendance meeting with the Crown and see what (if any) deal they're willing to offer. You could also (typically free of charge) have a consultation with a paralegal and see if they think they can do any better for you. One important point to consider is what kind of impact the conviction will have on insurance. Sometimes paralegal fees may be more up front, but save you money in the long run with insurance.
As for arguing unfamiliar car, sensitive throttle, etc., that will get you nowhere is terms of a defence against the charge as it stands.
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time. I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Tazo wrote:
I was driving a car that I was unaccustomed to, that has a very, very sensitive acceleration (Mazda 3) on a highway that was almost devoid of traffic (didn't have much flow of traffic I could adjust to).
If this is how you're expecting to represent yourself in court, i'd beg that you get a paralegal. Speeding is an absolute liability and can't be talked out of. The Justice of the Peace is only interested in whether you were speeding or not. Please don't repeat this sensitive throttle story to anyone else because it doesn't make your story better in the slightest. 50 and over is not something to take lightly. If you're ever going to pay for a Paralegal, this should be the time.
I may be wrong here, but the reason why you received a ticket with no speed is because 50km and over is a straight summons to court. There's no set fine for going 80 over, therefore you are given a date to the courthouse.
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys. I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
Tazo wrote:
Thanks for your quick and straight forward replies guys.
I'm going to look for some quotes from paralegals tomorrow. To be honest, I just don't really understand what a paralegal will do for me. They can't change the facts of my case - that I committed the crime and I don't have a leg to stand on in terms of my defence. Can a paralegal do anything other than guide me through the process at this point?
The paralegal will know the system well and will be able to tell you whether there are any holes in the prosecution's case. Some times the police make technical errors that can be used as a defense in court. The paralegal will see if the police have dotted all the I's and crossed all the T's. If they have, he can then probably tell you what kind of deal can be worked out with the prosecution to help lower the impact this will have on your record.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need. Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons. Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah. See what I did in this thread: http://www.ontariohighwaytrafficact.com ... tml#p27314 I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
The first thing you need to do is do what you need to and get the disclosure, and a copy of officers written notes, etc. Go to Ticket Combat and follow the steps, there is even a form you can download and fill out to help you get what you need.
Only then will you know how to proceed from there, and whether you have any leg to stand on at all. From what you said so far, it appears you don't, and I'll agree with the others on reasons.
Once you have these things, then you then might want to setup a free consultation with a Paralegal. Of course this will be FREE, so they will only very quickly look through your stuff if you are lucky to look for potential issues to exploit. Also, of course, they want your business, and will make a case on why you will be much better off with them, blah blah blah.
I updated for you with the final outcome. Good luck, maybe the Crown will take some kind of pity on you (if you are poor in anyway might be worth mentioning) and offer a decent deal, but 180 is really fast, and if the officer caught you on radar (there are arguments against radar and ways to try and lesson the merit but I wouldn't count on them) then you are up the creek I'm sure.
Hi folks, I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'. So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of. Thanks for your time.
Hi folks,
I've got a question. I did a search of my name on the internet recently and was surprised to find an "OPP News Release" describing a 'Racing a Motor Vehicle' offence I was charged with. I ended up accepting an early resolution with the prosecutor, which involved pleading guilty to a lesser charge. Rather than 'Racing a Motor Vehicle', I was convicted of 'Speeding'.
So my question is, do I have any rights with regards to requesting the OPP remove/modify their 'News Release'? I obviously don't want this information on the internet at all - let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error. You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Tazo wrote:
let alone describing a crime for which I was not ultimately convicted of.
The article probably states you were charged, which you were. It doesn't mean you were convicted. Factually, it's sound. They aren't obligated to amend articles or releases based on new information unless it was in error.
You can try contacting someone involved and see if something can be worked out.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend. Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions. I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Thanks for the quick reply Bend.
Yeah, I've being doing some research myself, into defamation law, and I've come to the same conclusions.
I've been considering calling the Constable that gave me the ticket, as his contact information is on the News Release. Alternatively, I could try and contact the township in which I received the ticket, as it is posted on their website. I have a feeling that my argument, about being convicted of a lesser charge, isn't going to elicit much sympathy from the Constable. So I think I may try to the township first, and the Constable as a last resort.
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not? I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate. OPS
Nothing will change The release is factual and correct. At the time you were charged with race a motor vehicle were you not?
I have had people contact me to try and get accidents reports changed after they beat a charge in court. I tell them no there will be no deletions or additions. The report is factual and correct at the time. What happens in court is separate.
Thanks for the response OPS. I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks. Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
Thanks for the response OPS.
I contacted the township and they informed me that they reset the OPP News Releases every new year. Meaning it should only be up there a few more weeks.
Appreciate all the help everybody, happy holidays.
I got my first ticket(s) in 15 years, for a rolling stop of the Gardiner West ramp at Yonge, by a whole bunch of cruisers under the bridge pegging off people 1 by 1. I didn't have my wallet, so 1 ticket no licence surrendered, 1 ticket fail to stop.
1)Should I use a professional rep in court? or
2) My natural thought would be to pay the no licence ticket, and reschedule the court date later for…
Yesterday, I made the stupidest mistake of my entire life. I was on the way back to my apartment after studying at school. It was around 8:30 pm. What happened is that I tried to follow the curve of the road, which is very icy because the city truck does not usually pour salt on the road ( there was a snow storm in the early morning that day), I was going 55-60 km/hr. The speed limit was 50km/h.…
When one gets a ticket and at the time of the ticket, the COP had video taped the interaction, can the COP delete the video legally even though it holds evidentuary value should it go to trial ?
The officer observed him driving by from about 20 meters away. Given that the officer allegedly didn't see the seatbelt. Is this evidence ? My point would be that evidence requires you to actually see something, not seeing something is not evidence ?
alright well last night (march 19th) at 12:55 am i had recieved 2 tickets the first was failing to stop at a stop sign (i did a rolling stop) and it was dated the 19th the second ticket that i got at the exact same time was dated the 18th. The second one was because i had a blood alcohol level of 0.0025 instead of zero (i have a g2)
I'm considering buying a strap-on motor for a bicycle for this summer, such as the one at www.motorizedbicycle.ca/bicyâ¦ant-head-bike-motor-kit.html . However, I haven't been able to find any clear answers about what part of the law, if any, they fall under. The kit in question has a motor with a displacement of more than 50 cubic centimeters, which seems to mean it doesn't fall under the HTA's…
I was turning left from Creditview into the left lane of Argentia Road (in Missisauga), while a police cruiser driving the opposite direction turning right into the right lane of Argentia Road. As I saw the cruiser turning right into the right lane of Argentia Road, I also turned left into the left lane of Argentia Road. The officer stopped me and told me that I was wrong, I had to wait until…
Bac above zero, g2 driver, 24 hour suspension. Had half a beer and drove 1 hr later. Failed breathalizer. I am in police foundations college course, did i ruin my future career? First offence, otherwise clean.
So here is my situation, I was accused of speeding 127 km/h in a 100 km/h zone.
My ticket says contrary to "Highway Traffict Act #128". Set fine calculated by the officer is $101.25 ( $3.75/km). Plus $30 for court charges and Victim charges to a total of $131.25.
However, according to section 128 i should be paying 27 x $4.5/km = $121.50 + Plus $30 for court charges and Victim charges to a total of…
So I was driving this morning to work at a new location in Toronto. I made a left turn into a street and a police officer was there waiting. He informed me you cannot make left turns between 7-9am. I told him I did not see or notice any sign. I have a clean driving record and never got a ticket before. Nonetheless, he hit me with a disobey sign ticket ( 182.2). I went back to the…
I was served with a Fail to Surrender Insurance Card (S3(1) of Compulsory Auto Insurance Act). He received it within the jurisdiction of Barrie POA. The trial is scheduled for November 14 2017.
I was stopped by Barrie OPP on my way back from a weekend up in Midland ON on June 28, 2017 and I originally had a digital copy of my insurance card but the officer wouldn't have it. He required a…
i recently got pulled over by an opp in and undercover car for going 118 in an 80.
I am planning on fighting it because i cant really afford the $283 ticket or the 4 demerit points because i have already gotten a speeding ticket in the states which got me 3 demerit points.
so here is my story, i was following a van that was going to slow for my liking so i…
I've been researching for months for defence strategy and basic trial information regarding my speeding ticket. However, the information is so conflicting that I have no confidence whatsoever that I know what I'm doing.
I didn't get this info from a friend of a friend, it came from this website, court officials, case laws, and a consultation with a traffic ticket fighting company.
Hi Gang. I'm back, but I'm asking for a friend this time.
A friend received a ticket the other day for driving 87 km/h in a 70 km/h zone. The problem is it's a posted 80 zone (I've verified this fact with him). Is an incorrectly identified speed limit a fatal error? There isn't a police officer in the province who would stop a driver who's only 7 km/h over the limit, so if the officer had realized…
Need some help here for the 1st time speeding ticket?
Sunday morning 12:10am when I was going home from work I was doing bit speeding on Gardiner. I was going with about 130km/h. I know its fast. I always take the same way and I know where the cops hide. They always hide entrance of the highways. If I will do speeding I always look my back and did look this time too. I took gardiner…
I have several problems and I'm wondering what my options are. This past weekend I was driving home from Lake Huron and was caught going 112 in an 80km/h zone. I am currently on my Quebec probationary license which is revoked at 4 demerit points. The penalty in Quebec for going +32 km/h over is 3 demerits, but even then it's cutting things close. The Ontario penalty is 4 demerits, will I receive…
I was pulled over for not having the front plate on the bumper, the plate was VERY clearly visible on the dash from the front. The only reason the officer pulled me over because the car is flashy and stands out. I was not speeding or doing anyting wrong. He insisted that it has to be on the bumper, I asked him to show me that in the HTA and he said that he could not as its common sense that it…
i was driving my dad's car when i was caught by the red light camera in Brampton. My dad would've to take time off work to go ask for a trial and then go to one.
Can i represent him? if yes, what do i need to do?
I'll tell the story of the accident quickly.. I was coming back from work near the airport around 6pm, when I got near Dufferin and Steeles. I approached a red light and my brakes completely stopped working, I pressed on it and it went all the way down loosely, I tried to go into the island separating the streets but ended up crashing into 3 cars waiting at the light. Nobody was seriously hurt…