Search found 14 matches
- Thu Jun 14, 2012 4:38 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
Re: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
So I ended up studding my tires and got a ticket for it at a RIDE check. In preparing my defence, I noticed that the law has a very narrow, scientific definition of what a stud is. In particular, it defines a stud as something that has a Moh's hardness measurement of greater than 7. I knew the Crown...
- Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:19 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Motion of non suit or make a defence argument?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1922
Motion of non suit or make a defence argument?
The crown needs to prove a key fact in order to convict me, and I know she has no evidence in this regard. Would the usual strategy be to raise a motion of non suit immediately following the crown's presentation, or would I simply make an argument in my defence that the crown has not brought a prima...
- Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:11 am
- Forum: Courts and Procedure
- Topic: Inadequate disclosure; delay charged to DEFENCE?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1331
Inadequate disclosure; delay charged to DEFENCE?
I received disclosure 2 days prior to the trial, although the information was available to the crown 3 weeks earlier. The officer's notes were illegible, so I requested a typed version, which was not supplied in time for the trial. In discussions with the crown as to a new trial date, she was propos...
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:31 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: wrong information on the NOTICE OF TRIAL
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1941
Re: wrong information on the NOTICE OF TRIAL
What if the notice of trial is for a different offence than what one was charged with? I was charged with running studs contrary to some regulation of the HTA, and the notice of trial is for making a false statement to an officer. The charging document is valid and is for running studs.
- Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:29 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Calibration discrepancy or sloppy writing - viable defence?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3509
Re: Calibration discrepancy or sloppy writing - viable defen
just to clarify for you it is not a "calibration" section. It is the speedometer comparison section, which is the correlation between the speedometer and the reading on the "patrol" area of the radar Just to clarify for you, whenever you compare the reading of a measuring device...
- Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:50 am
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 30 to 49 km/h
- Topic: Charge Withdrawn - Success story
- Replies: 46
- Views: 20844
Re: Charge Withdrawn - Success story
After doing some research on this and emailing IC I did manage to find out that the Decatur products are all Industry Canada certified. I have attached a link if anyone is interested. http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/sitt/reltel/srch/prfrmRELSrch.do;jsessionid=0000mwx4kE8pSFMVZB3MrhI7Bel:15ds6qt0j I couldn'...
- Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:14 pm
- Forum: Exceeding the speed limit by 16 to 29 km/h
- Topic: Calibration discrepancy or sloppy writing - viable defence?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3509
Calibration discrepancy or sloppy writing - viable defence?
The officer seems to have written "60" where "50" should appear in the calibration section of the disclosure sheet. Is it a viable defense to claim that the radar unit might have been out of calibration? http://i465.photobucket.com/albums/rr20/DrXenon/Speeding%20Ticket/Screenshot...
- Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:19 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Hands Free only Ocober 26, 2009
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3110
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:03 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
I think you guys make a good point. Given that the benefit of studs seems to be pretty slight, maybe they're not worth getting, especially if getting my car towed depending on the Man's whim is a possibility. I can just see myself in a freezing cold garage with a pair of pliers, making the tires rea...
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:23 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
If you accept the ~4% accident reduction attributable to stud use in the 10-year-old meta-study linked below, and refer to the Ministry of Transport's 2006 accident statistics, you conclude that 737 fewer people would sustain a personal injury every year if everybody used studs. (I considered winter...
- Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:53 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
Here's the perfect solution: studs that can be deployed as needed by the driver and retracted when there's no ice:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/q-tire.htm/printable
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/q-tire.htm/printable
- Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:48 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
- Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:16 pm
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
Thanks for the informative and reasoned responses. In looking at recent European tests, in particular one including studded and unstudded versions of similar tires (both from Gislaved), I notice that the dry braking distance from 60 km/h was 22.5 m for the studded and 22 m for the unstudded. I consi...
- Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:53 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 43940
Typical fine for studded tires in Southern Ontario?
Based on Nordic country test reports, I'm considering getting studded winter tires. I live in Eastern Ontario, though, so this is in violation of Regulation 617/05, which says that only people who live in Northern Ontario are allowed to have them. I'd be doing this as a conscientious objector becaus...