Search found 9 matches
- Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:50 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
Yes it is Timmins,, not sure if i even included that information, .. seems like nobody really can convince me that i am guilty of this *EDIT*. i have not done anything yet regarding disclosure , not sure if i go to city hall, or the police station here. but i think i will wait till after the holiday...
- Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:06 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
lol i dont know about that.. i was without reasonable doubt in the act of unloading merchandise as it needed to be unloaded into the business. but you never know things like that worry me. i dont think its reasonable for the situation (4 demerits total and 220$) guess ill be safer parking in front o...
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:40 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
bump for some more answers
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:45 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
Sounds reasonable to me, and i have already done so. with that being said, do you think he can bring up things like he previously saw me parking, or while off duty or whatnot?? or does trail SOLEY hear specific offence details? Because i have Witnesses (my boss) that can testify to the fact it was a...
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:32 am
- Forum: General Talk
- Topic: front license plate position in ontario
- Replies: 13
- Views: 64611
Re: front license plate position in ontario
that is pretty visable to me! but who knows what a policeman will consider legit. i can see the whole window thing not being visable at ALL times (reflections) , In the Revised Regulations of Ontario under the Highway Traffic Act, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 628, s. 9 (3) states: "The number plates for a...
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:34 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
Anyone else? I believe i am a victim here of a powertrip, The officer always rambles why its a problem in the city.. blah blah.. but i believe that is out of range of his job, the street is well signed its not guetto, like i said the next block closer to the main highway is signed NO STOPPING ... wh...
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:20 pm
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
Thank you for your input, greatly appreciated! And Temporarily (in my case) means stopping, getting out walking roughly 15 - 20 footsteps, into the restaurant and possibly 5 more to the counter to pay for my orders, all at a close distance i can see my car completely at all times. The officer DID NO...
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:33 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Re: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
In the DEFINITIONS (beginning of act) it makes it clear how to interpret the terminology they use.... to be more dam specific iTS THE FIRST CHAPTER.. im guessing policeman do not read here. check it out and read what they define as parking.. "park" or "parking", when prohibited, ...
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:31 am
- Forum: Failing to obey signs
- Topic: Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
- Replies: 16
- Views: 6352
Charged 182 (2) - NO PARKING SIGN
Im not sure if its just me or this sounds ridiculous, AND not only was i charged once for this (court pending March1st 2012) i was previously charged for the same exact thing by the same exact POLICEMAN 4 months prior. Ill explain what happened. First of all i was not even in my car LOL i was inside...