I beat a pacing ticket my wife got. The trial was earlier today.
My defence was that the officer did not test the speedo on the day the PON was issued.
My line of questioning was like this (paraphrased):
Me: Have you ever used radar or lidar in your duties as a traffic enforcement officer?
(Prosecution objected - this case does not involve radar or lidar)
(I said - I have a point I am getting to, I am drawing a comparison.)
(JP allowed me to continue).
Him: Yes, and I am an instructor for other officers on radar and lidar.
Me: Tell me, what do you do before using a radar or lidar?
Him: I test it.
Me: Why do you do that?
Him: To make sure it works.
Me: Why did you not then test your speedometer, if that was the instrument you used to lay the charge?
Him: It comes calibrated from the factory when the car is built. And we do sometimes test it against radar or lidar.
Me: But you didn't test it on the day in question did you?
Him: I don't recall.
Me: You made no record of any testing in your notes did you?
Him: No.
Me: Do you have the certificate of calibration for the speedometer?
Him: No.
Me: Have you even seen this certificate personally?
Him: No.
Me: So, then how can you say that the speedometer was reliable?
Him: It appeared to be working normally.
Me: But you didn't test it. Right?
....
And around and around we went. He was very evasive in his answers, and I had to persist for a while before the JP told him to smarten up, and just answer the questions.
- PbFoot