Page 1 of 1

What's With The Grey Parts Of The Hta?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:48 pm
by xjonathan

So, looking through the HTA, there's a lot of grey parts there. Are these applicable? Some date back to 1994. Example:

On a day to be named by proclamation of the Lieutenant Governor, subsection (1) is amended by the Statutes of Ontario, 1994, chapter 27, subsection 138 (1) by adding the following definition:

I read that to say this isn't in effect yet...is that correct?


EDIT: Assuming the above is correct, and they eventually get proclaimed, are they then retroactive to any past occurrences that may be before the court?


Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
by Reflections

The date to be proclaimed......legal jargon for: date to be instated. The hands free bill was worded the same.



As for your edit, you cannot create a law to try someone. If you manage to do something that is not defined the gov't can't create a law to smack you with. If they create it then you break it, then to court you can go...


Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:02 am
by xjonathan

Thanks...so I take it to mean, anything in grey isn't yet law?


(when I say grey, I'm referring to the greyed-out portions of the online version of the HTA here


Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 12:05 am
by Reflections

Those would be changes made as of that copy. Unchanged is left as normal text, no background shading.