hwybear wrote:HTA 78(1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a highway if the display screen of a television, computer or other device in the motor vehicle is visible to the driver
I read this as: if my passenger is using their mp3 player in the front seat, I can get a ticket if I can just SEE their screen. It doesn't even say the screen needs to be on. I never realized blank screens were so distracting to the driver
Here's an example: I was travelling with a friend of my dad's from Ottawa to Toronto last weekend and received a text message while in the front passenger seat during the ride. I read the message without a second thought. Should I actually have asked him to pull over so I could read the message? Does this seem a little extreme to you?
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with the whole purpose of the distracted driving laws and think that distracted driving is a definite hazard on the road. But give me a break. I really don't think many people become any more of a hazard on the road if their front passenger is reading a text message or changing a song on their mp3 player. If I'm correct in my interpretation, I somewhat take offense to the fact that the Ontario government is passing laws that assume everyone has a severe case of ADD.
However, I'm not 100% confident in my interpretation of this law. So for my own clarification I have a couple of scenarios and I'd like to see what somebody else's take on them are:
- 1. If I have my mp3 player plugged into my car's stereo by the AUX port can I change songs on the mp3 player while driving?
2. Does the answer change if it is plugged into my tape deck by an adapter?
3. If I am using an FM transmitter?
4. If I'm using an iPod touch rather than an iPod nano because the iPod touch has wifi capability (even though while driving it isn't usable)?
5. What if I'm using an iPod shuffle (no screen at all)?
6. What if I'm using my mp3 player with headphones rather than plugged into the car's stereo?
7. Finally, what if I'm driving my younger brother to University for his final exam period and he wants to study his notes during the ride. If his notes are on his laptop during the trip does he have to be in the back seat? I sure don't have any interest in his course on 17th century European history so I sure won't be tempted to read whatever is on his laptop screen.
I have a feeling that different officers will have different responses to the items on this list which really shouldn't be the case.
I hope officers are using their judgment when enforcing this law and only targetting blatent offenders. I also honestly don't think that because text is displayed on a digital screen it becomes oh so much more distracting than a hard copy.
I understand that my interpretation of the law probably has some flaws, so I would really appreciate if somebody were to shed some light on the 7 scenarios I gave just so I can try to better understand what can get me in trouble and what might go one way or the other depending on the officer.
I'd just like to add that I only took a few minutes to think up these scenarios (all of which I've encountered before) and I feel like I have at least come up with one scenario where the law has potential to be enforced where it wasn't intended to be. In my mind this means they should have taken more time to write this law properly before putting it on the books.
On a slightly related side note when I opened up the HTA to try and look up any subsections or exclusions for section 78, a couple of things caught my eye which I thought were somewhat funny laws that are in the HTA.
Sleigh bells
77. (1) Every person travelling on a highway with a sleigh or sled drawn by a horse or other animal shall have at least two bells attached to the harness or to the sleigh or sled in such a manner as to give ample warning sound. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 77 (1).
Penalty
(2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $5. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 77 (2).
I wonder how often that one gets laid and if the crown would even bother to read your disclosure request Yes I understand the purpose of the law but come on a $5 fine. How much money would have been spent to get this law on the books or even enforced
Horse racing on highway
173. No person shall race or drive furiously any horse or other animal on a highway. R.S.O. 1990, c. H.8, s. 173.
I wonder if my horse gets impounded for 7 days...will they feed him for me?