.
Hi Wilchris:
---> this is an opinion and NOT legal advice <--- I am guessing and assuming that you are referring to the intersection of Queen St. and Airport Rd. in Brampton.
If my assumption is correct, Airport Rd., northbound approaching Queen St., has 6 lanes; counting from left to right:
Lanes #1 and #2 are left turning lanes.
Lanes #3, #4 and #5 are through lanes and
Lane #6 is a right turning lane
Wilchris wrote:... the northbound right lane on airport road at queen street which exits is closed due to construction and...
they have put the right turn sign on the adjacent lane in the black background.
Also the right lane north of Queen Street at Airport road is closed and they have an arrow sign there which indicates to merge in to the left lane.
Lane #6 is closed due to construction and the temporary right turn designation sign refers now to lane #5.
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/e ... e.htm#BK13 In other words, lane #5 is now a designated right turning lane.
Wilchris wrote:I was going north on airport road and was in right lane. I merged in to left lane just before the intersection ... and crossed the intersection
You were going in lane #6, merged into lane #5 and went through the intersection.
Wilchris wrote:If he is referring to the Right Lane Exits sign, the right lane is closed so basically the sign in not valid. In fact, i obeyed the left lane merger sign.
Most likely the officer refers to the temporary right turning lane designation sign, which made lane #5 a right turning lane.
Remember? ..."they have put the right turn sign on the adjacent lane"
I think you did disobey the line designation sign.
Wilchris wrote:...the officer ... handed me a $110 ticket under HTA 182(2) for disobeying the sign.
However, it does not say on the ticket which sign is he talking about. shouldn't it say clearly which sign I disobeyed?
I would suggest that, in fact, the certificate does not properly describe the offence as it does not make a reference to R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 615, s. 34 (1) of the HTA. Further, it should also make reference to Figure 2.
As such, I would suggest that, the certificate does not permit the defendant make full answer and defense. Alternatively, due to ambiguity, the certificate refers to an offence not known to law.
But that is just my opinion based on a number of assumed facts.
Did you file your Notice of Intention to Appear yet? Cheers.
..