-
- Newbie
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 8:04 pm
Red Light Camera Warning Signage Legislation?
I'm sure there is legislation that states a red light camera must have a warning sign prior to it, as every red light camera has one, and I've seen a news article reference said legislation, however they were not specific enough. Have checked the HTA, found nothing on the subject, didn't expect to find anything in there.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2018 10:29 am
I sent the same question to the City of Ottawa.
Their reply was that those signs are a courtesy, and although they put them at all the intersections in the city with a camera (on all approaches tho, not just the direction of the camera), they are under no obligation to do so. They told me the signs are not required by the regulations in the HTA, but they try to have them in place to "assist with driver education".
However, interestingly, the specific intersection I questioned had the missing signs erected immediately - by the end of the same day I sent in the email.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 8:04 pm
I don't believe that to be true, wouldn't trust the city. I'd want to see something in writing.
The city of Kingston states in a red light camera FAQ that:
"All intersections with red light cameras must be signed on all 4 approaches".
Source: https://www.cityofkingston.ca/documents/10180/15058/Kingston_Traffic_RedLightCamera_FAQ.pdf/47b382f3-0cc6-4163-8bc2-409865d312cd
There has to be some legislation, or even guideline somewhere.
I'm sure that sign went back up that fast because the city didn't want to jeopardize even one day's worth of revenue from that approach at the intersection. Meaning, hypothetically of course, that tickets contested in court could win on that basis.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 8:04 pm
Interesting related article about warning signage distance in Ontario where individual beat ticket in court claiming:
"The red-light camera warning sign is 100 feet before the intersection, it needs to be 400 feet before to give people a chance to react."
https://www.toronto.com/news-story/4954735-vaughan-man-beats-325-red-light-camera-ticket-in-court/
imnotguilty wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:13 amI'm sure there is legislation that states a red light camera must have a warning sign prior to it, as every red light camera has one, and I've seen a news article reference said legislation, however they were not specific enough. Have checked the HTA, found nothing on the subject, didn't expect to find anything in there.
There is no legal requirement for warning signs. Any sign should be considered as a courtesy. In the end, they are not instructing you to do anything.
imnotguilty wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2019 8:56 pmI don't believe that to be true, wouldn't trust the city. I'd want to see something in writing.
The city of Kingston states in a red light camera FAQ that:
"All intersections with red light cameras must be signed on all 4 approaches".
Source: https://www.cityofkingston.ca/documents/10180/15058/Kingston_Traffic_RedLightCamera_FAQ.pdf/47b382f3-0cc6-4163-8bc2-409865d312cd
There has to be some legislation, or even guideline somewhere.
I'm sure that sign went back up that fast because the city didn't want to jeopardize even one day's worth of revenue from that approach at the intersection. Meaning, hypothetically of course, that tickets contested in court could win on that basis.
Guidelines, FAQ's, Driving Manuals, etc are not legal material. At the end of the day, they will all usually tell you to refer back to the HTA.
imnotguilty wrote: ↑Sat May 04, 2019 8:58 pmInteresting related article about warning signage distance in Ontario where individual beat ticket in court claiming:
"The red-light camera warning sign is 100 feet before the intersection, it needs to be 400 feet before to give people a chance to react."
https://www.toronto.com/news-story/4954735-vaughan-man-beats-325-red-light-camera-ticket-in-court/
He did not beat the ticket with that argument. That type of argument would be considered during trial, not before. The ticket was dismissed for whatever reason. There are tons of reasons why that may be. It is not explained in the article.
Re: Red Light Camera Warning Signage Legislation?
And FYI. The City of Kingston doesn’t have red light cameras.
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Caught running a red light by a red light camera, and going with option 2 for early resolution.
by Carrasp68 in General TalkLast post by bend Mon Sep 16, 2019 12:10 am
-
-
-
New post Red light camera ticket - broken down truck on the light
Last post by bend Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:01 am
-
-
-
New post red light turn - red light camera in the intersection
Last post by bend Wed Sep 15, 2021 6:11 pm
-
-
-
New post Red light camera flashed while sitting at light.
Last post by bend Fri Apr 16, 2021 11:17 pm
-
-
-
New post Caught running a red light by a red light camera. Which is better option 1 to go trial or option 2 for early resolution
by Enrique in General TalkLast post by bend Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:44 am
-
-
-
New post What happens when legislation gets out of hand
by FiReSTaRT in General TalkLast post by FiReSTaRT Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:53 pm
-
-
-
New post Electronic Device Legislation
by hwybear in General TalkLast post by Squishy Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:18 pm
-
-
-
New post Red light camera's
by jjory in Failing to obey a stop sign, traffic control stop/slow sign, traffic light or railway crossing signalLast post by Traffic Law Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:47 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest