Topic

Hydroplane Into Ditch, Careless Charge

Author: DaveOke


Post Reply
DaveOke
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:07 pm

Hydroplane Into Ditch, Careless Charge

Unread post by DaveOke »

Hello,


I'm trying to help someone out. They were driving while it was raining. They were traveling the speed limit and were not distracted in any way (no cell phone, GPS, sat radio...etc). The car went into a curve but when they turned the steering wheel to exit the curve, the car continued straight... resulting in the car going in the ditch and rolling. Thankfully no one was hurt except for the car.


Witness travelling behind the car said that there was no excessive speed. Officer charged the person since "There's no other excuse for the crash".


I think it's a pretty heavy charge for what happened but oh well. I already said "fight it" but it this something that a paralegal should be hired for or should should it be fought alone?

liveontheedge
Member
Member
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:23 pm

Unread post by liveontheedge »

Your friend can check with the paralegals to see what they can do.

Or wait till getting the disclosure to see what evidences the cop has or just some hearsay from the witnesses. If no witness shows up at trial charge may be dropped.

User avatar
Bookm
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Stratford, Ontario

Unread post by Bookm »

Very easy to beat. It's a shame the cost of a paralegal will probably be necessary if your friend is new to fighting tickets.

User avatar
Squishy
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:45 am
Location: Orillia
Contact:

Unread post by Squishy »

There was no excuse for that crash. However, a careless conviction may be too harsh (insurance increases) if a lesson has been learned. Good news for you is that careless is sometimes applied when no other charge seems to fit, and I hear the courts have high standards for a conviction.

User avatar
ponyboyt
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:17 pm

Unread post by ponyboyt »

seen ths one before. Almost the exact same accident.


"Was doing the speed limit".


Cop said "you should be doing under the limit if its raining, therefore, 'careless'". Speed limit means speed limit. Weather conditons require you to adjust accordingly.

User avatar
hwybear
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2934
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Posting Awards

Unread post by hwybear »

This why there should be a new section added to the HTA for severity of this type of thing.

- leave roadway $110 and 0 points

- leave roadway causing damage $220 and 3 points

- leave roadway causing injury $325 and 6 points


It is a waste of resources (police, fire, EMS) responding to incidents where drivers can not keep their vehicle on the road.

Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
User avatar
hwybear
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2934
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Posting Awards

Unread post by hwybear »

Squishy wrote:I thought Fantino proposed that a few years ago. What became of it?

think it was after some winter storm where there was well over 1000 vehicles needlessly in ditches and it was mentioned in the paper, but don't think any government mentioned it.

Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
User avatar
beleafer81
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:05 pm

Unread post by beleafer81 »

Ya the police just want some money for responding to the scene. I guess the tax increaces arnt enough. They lay careless charges to easily. Glad you didn't have to pay. So Can you fill in the blanks as to how the charge was dropped?

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “Careless Driving”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests