-
s172_CHARGED
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:28 pm
Appeals Court Decision - Reserved...
Even after countless debates and several JP's and and even higher appeals court ruling that s.172
IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, the rogue (agenda driven)
prosecutors (read persecutors) are still hell bent on one thing.
VENGEANCE!dis·pas·sion·ate
Function: adjective
: not influenced by strong feeling; especially : not affected by personal or emotional involvement :
Can someone tell me / speculate why these prosecutors are not acting dispassionately as they are
supposed to as set out by the guidelines from the UCLC rules [(duty as a prosecutor 4.01(3)
that governs the practices of provincial prosecutors?
I don't understand why they are not abating to general public and higher
court consensus?? Something starting to smell pretty rotten!
To these prosecutors, every ticket against them counts against them. That's why many will offer a reduced penalty if there is a prospect of them loosing. Doing one's job properly is a great motivator. Whoever said that a lawyer was a devil's advocate was right - there are criminal lawyers that make possible letting people go free from a murder trial.
"The hardest thing to explain is the obvious"
Ontario Traffic Ticket | Ontario Highway Traffic Act
-
fortec_man
- Newbie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:20 pm
Although there are a couple of judgements saying that the 50 over part of the legislation is unconstitutional, there's now another judgement from a few weeks ago saying that it's ok. Until a decision comes from a high enough court, you'll continue to see prosecutions.
-
hwybear
- High Authority
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
- Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!
fortec_man wrote:Although there are a couple of judgements saying that the 50 over part of the legislation is unconstitutional, there's now another judgement from a few weeks ago saying that it's ok. Until a decision comes from a high enough court, you'll continue to see prosecutions.
...if it holds at higher it will remain, if not, the gov't will just reword...and go through the process again...
Anyone have any idea when the decision will be? I thought it was supposed to by the end of this month (February).
-
Reflections
- High Authority
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
cruzmisl wrote:Anyone have any idea when the decision will be? I thought it was supposed to by the end of this month (February).
End of month + Court system = Aug???? 
-
Radar Identified
- High Authority
- Posts: 2881
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:26 pm
- Location: Toronto
Reflections wrote:End of month + Court system = Aug????
August of 2012, maybe...
http://www.OntarioTicket.com OR http://www.OHTA.ca
-
Reflections
- High Authority
- Posts: 1489
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:49 pm
- Location: somewhere in traffic
Radar Identified wrote:Reflections wrote:End of month + Court system = Aug????
August of 2012, maybe...
giggle
-
- Similar Topics
-
-
New post Appeals process....
by cruzmisl in General TalkLast post by ticketcombat Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:34 pm
-
-
-
New post appealing an appealed decision
by Dan in General TalkLast post by Bookm Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:08 am
-
-
-
New post Procedures required to Appeal POA decision
by camper66 in Courts and ProcedureLast post by Radar Identified Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:38 pm
-
-
-
New post Appeal or review from Minister's decision Sect. 7.9
by racer in PART 2: PermitsLast post by racer Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:15 pm
-
-
-
New post Lower Court not bound by Appeal Court?
by hwybear in Stunt DrivingLast post by hwybear Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:34 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
