Hta 136 (1)(a)failure To Stop At Stop Sign, Arguement Valid?
So heres my case, does it have any validity? Im argueing that the officer did not have a justified view of where and if my car stopped or not, which it did.

This is the officers view of the stop sign i "disobeyed"

Another possible viewpoint, just so i can say that he cant see regardless

As you can see he cannot see the line where i must stop

As close are possible (which he wasnt) to the intersection, the officer still cannot see because of glare. (I took this the very next day, exact same time)

This is the actual intersection, the officer is hidden in the side road. Notice the crosswalk and the stop sign line, and how they could easily be confused from the officers viewpoint
So what are my chances of winning this case?