Red Light Camera Ticket - Waterloo V. Yan Defense Still Work
Hey guys, filed for trial on a red light camera ticket.
11b doesn't apply because it's only 8 months from offence to trial.
Next is filing for disclosure which I read somewhere a person said they'll only provide the photographs as disclosure.
I can obviously argue incomplete disclosure if I want the officer's certification, etc.
However, I'm wondering if it's a better defense to use:
Waterloo v. Yan (http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/20 ... 32076.html)
Ticketcombat and many others mentioned this case. Basically the court said a photograph is not admissible if it doesn't have the location on the actual photograph (section 32) of that link above.
QUESTION IS: does anyone know if this argument is still valid or if it had ever worked in court?