Topic

“Reduction From Careless Driving: Good Deal Or Bad Deal?”

Author: DynamicLegal

Post Reply

Is a reduction to "Follow Too Close" from Careless Driving, a good deal (in the average case)?

Yes it is.
4
40%
No it isn't.
6
60%
 
Total votes: 10
User avatar
ticketcombat
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:
Contact ticketcombat

Unread post by ticketcombat »

Bookm wrote:Not something I'll ever be concerned with :D
I've been wanting to do something like that for awhile but thinking more of a surveillance cam that I could leave in the car when parked (I've had my share of scrape and runs). Have you ever used the video in court? And is the speedometer visible?

Fight Your Ticket!
Top
User avatar
Bookm
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Stratford, Ontario

Unread post by Bookm »

ticketcombat wrote:... is the speedometer visible?

It is, but I can't seem to get decent quality out of Youtube. Also, this tape has been overwritten about 20 times. Still good enough for fault evidence though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6IjLWEMMgs

I waited till minicam prices came down to my level ($230) before I could get one. There's a simple wingnut holding it in place (securely) so I can remove it easily. Now I feel very vulnerable driving without it. Never used in court yet. Cheap insurance though.

Top
User avatar
BelSlySTi
Member
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:35 am

Unread post by BelSlySTi »

I hit black ice E/B on Lakeshore right on the bridge that crosses the Don River @ 3am in 1989, scary stuff and over in a instant!


Brand new Rz350 slid right through that intersection, while I stopped slidding right at the white line :lol:

[img]http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l352/toastedwhitebread/Untitled-TrueColor-03.jpg[/img]
Top
User avatar
hwybear
High Authority
High Authority
Posts: 2934
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 7:21 am
Location: In YOUR rearview mirror!

Posting Awards

Unread post by hwybear »

ticketcombat wrote: ice frozen without many air bubbles trapped inside, making it transparent. Black ice takes the color of the material it lies on top of, often wet asphalt or a darkened pond. Its difficult-to-detect nature makes it a significant hazard to drivers, pedestrians, and sailors.

AH HA....ice is still clear......it's the colour beneath showing through :)

Above is merely a suggestion/thought and in no way constitutes legal advice or views of my employer. www.OHTA.ca
Top
User avatar
ticketcombat
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:
Contact ticketcombat

Unread post by ticketcombat »

hwybear wrote:AH HA....ice is still clear......it's the colour beneath showing through
Well technically black is the absence of color or specifically, the absence of light. That is, black does not reflect or emit any light to the visual receptors in the eye. That's why you can't see black ice. But since we are so off topic: Bear, I concede, you win! :)
Last edited by ticketcombat on Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Fight Your Ticket!
Top
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics

Return to “Following too closely”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests